Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (82445)	4/6/2012 3:07:13 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"That isn't a non-seqitur, even in the way your misinterpreting it it would be a tautology not a non-sequitur" I did not misinterpret anything. Your post did not follow. It veered off. Hence the designation of being a non sequitur. It may not have been a non sequitur to the entire conversation that occurred years ago for several months if memory serves. But it was to the ONE post you responded to which was (obviously and naturally)the only one I was considering. "The overall point is that the fetus is a human." Good, you've made a point that I have never seen disputed. The fertilized egg (zygote) before twinning is also human life. So do you have a point other than stating the obvious that the zygote and the fetus have human DNA?