Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (21966)	4/7/2012 1:40:51 PM
From: arvitar	Respond to of 53574

Everything "seems pretty farfetched" to you, until you are proven to be incorrect, which seems to happen repeatedly.

To: Steady_on who wrote (21966)	4/7/2012 1:41:41 PM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

Part of your issue, Steady_on, is that you take information given to you by Mr. Bordynuik...and then file that away inside your brain as if it were unassailable fact. After all as you said, it hasn't been legally proven misleading yet, right? I'll point out that USSE put out a press release from a respected lab, Summit Labs, which showed two cuts of his pyrolysis oil/fuel...one was alkanes fitting almost perfectly in the gasoline range. One was slightly longer chains fitting almost perfectly in the diesel range. There's no possible way anything could have been misleading there, right?

To: Steady_on who wrote (21966)	4/7/2012 1:44:47 PM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

You didn't answer my question several days ago. Can you take me through your thought process for why you think processor #2 is now in continuous production?

To: Steady_on who wrote (21966)	4/7/2012 2:04:17 PM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

That said, I'll acknowledge that we have a difference of opinions. There may be some catalyst...it wouldn't be hard to get one. That said, the crux is still whether or not a catalyst with the capabilities of making diesel for under $0.25 exists other than as a story in Mr. Bordynuik's mind. You can't prove it exists, I can't prove it doesn't, Mr. Bordynuik, the person with all the answers likes being suggestive and leading but is reluctant to show any credible evidence. So we're stuck until 'soon' arrives with one unfortunate delay after another for about three years now.