Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (22012)	4/8/2012 1:48:19 AM
From: bob41	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

What was your answer? Instructing others on how and what to post and where they should and should not post is way above your pay scale. Posts that rant the party line of HJ and iHub pumpers should naturally be questioned. Here they are. HJ has given the rational person plenty of cause to do so. (posting a 20 paragraph WWII historical is useful to what purpose?)

To: Steady_on who wrote (22012)	4/8/2012 2:08:15 AM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Re:<" I have answered your question. Please don't waste the time of this board by bringing it up over and over. The company has stated several times that the #2 processor is in operation."> Bullsht on all counts. You've never answered and Mr. Bordynuik has never said it's in [continuous] operation. Re:<"This board will not accept any emails, relayed phone calls, or other communications as evidence of anything. So what's your point in asking?"> It's for you, not for anyone else. So you* can later try to resolve the discrepancy between what you were told and reality. As it stands now, you're going to say that you were merely stupid and naive for guessing the profits would arrive this quarter once you discover those profits didn't materialize like you anticipated. At least if you decide to ask, it will force you to draw a much needed line in the sand...which right now is only a soft "I'll merely once again reset my time line to next quarter when my hopes don't pan out this quarter" type of situation. Re:<"I am aware that pyrolysis without a catalyst makes much smaller hydrocarbon chains. I am also aware that refineries routinely crack longer chains of crude oil into shorter chains. What's your point?"> Based on your hanging on the word of some un-named person whom you said was "amazed" to see plastic broken down into small carbon chains with Mr. Bordynuik's flavor of pyrolysis.

To: Steady_on who wrote (22012)	4/8/2012 9:42:09 AM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

No you have not. Please don't wast the time of this board by obfuscation and evasion. Just give a straight answer to the question and that will be the end of it. I have answered your question. Please don't waste the time of this board by bringing it up over and over. "So again, why are you unwilling to ask Mr. Bordynuik about what remains to be done before a processor can be placed into continuous and profitable operation? Or what is your reasoning in believing processor #2 is already in continuous operation?"

To: Steady_on who wrote (22012)	5/8/2012 12:57:26 AM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

"This board will not accept any emails, relayed phone calls, or other communications as evidence of anything. So what's your point in asking?" So you will have something to push rather than your baseless personal assumption and so you will have a reason to follow up with Mr. Bordynuik when it doesn't happen. Even this board is more interested in what Mr. Bordynuik has to say than to debunk your baseless assumptions. "The company has stated several times that the #2 processor is in operation." And Mr. Bordynuik also said the company was in commercial operations. Did you see how that turned out? And Mr. Bordynuik said patents were being filed. Did you miss that? You could ask how much of the time it's been operating...as you can see, Mr. Bordynuik is slippery. If you assume "in operation" means more than testing, you're making assumptions where Mr. Bordynuik has shown the ability to take you to the cleaners.