SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steady_on who wrote (22021)4/8/2012 2:23:52 AM
From: PaperProphetRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 53574
 
...and I also suggested back then that you ask Mr. Bordynuik what remains to be done before a processor can be put in operation.

As it stands right now, you have a guess with no rational basis that Q1 will show the processor in continuous operation. When it doesn't happen then who do we turn to in order to resolve the discrepancy?? Oh yes...that would be your baseless guess.

Had you at any point in the last two years asked that simple question to Mr. Bordynuik then you would have a small shred on which you could hang your hat. "Mr. Bordynuik...you said [insert statement] but it didn't happen. Can you explain?"

Now it's only, "Mr. Bordynuik, continuous production didn't happen in the first quarter like I anticipated. Can you resolve the difference between reality and my baseless guess?"

It's not hard to ask that question, Steady_on. You could type up an e-mail and have it off in two minutes. I don't even know why you're afraid to ask.



To: Steady_on who wrote (22021)4/8/2012 2:25:55 AM
From: bob41Respond to of 53574
 
Hardly moot. BTW, the Islechem spin still has "massive" holes and "titanic" implications of incest. The absence of proof certainly shows an absence of science.