Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (22027)	4/8/2012 8:08:43 AM
From: SteveF	Respond to of 53574

I expect the 1st quarter Q to show $250 to $300 K in fuel sales. That represents 25 to 30 processor days of operation. That's only $10k/day: less than the expected output of a single processor before Honest John spent all of 2011 "improving" it.

To: Steady_on who wrote (22027)	4/8/2012 8:38:20 AM
From: flptrnkng	Respond to of 53574

You and Grand Master Z should get together on production metrics. You say $5,000 per machine per day of operation, or about $1.8M in maxed out potential production per machine. The Big Z says $10M per machine. JJ is silent on the topic, which is surprising; he's the only one who really knows. Edit: My mistake, you're saying $10,000 per machine per day But, you say they only got 30 processor days of production in 1Q, when we're told processor #2 came online on February 27th. Why all the down time in March? (And January and February, for that matter).

To: Steady_on who wrote (22027)	4/8/2012 11:39:07 AM
From: PaperProphet	Respond to of 53574

Re:<" I choose to keep my communications ( if any) with Mr Bordynuik private."> And I'm afraid to ask you the reason for your new, seemingly baseless criterion because even if I manage to get an answer, I'm sure I'll just get another contingent criterion as to why any such answer is impossible to obtain. Have a good Easter.

To: Steady_on who wrote (22027)	4/8/2012 3:52:03 PM
From: the_big_guy	Respond to of 53574

Steady: I can give you a good example of dishonesty that gets people like us riled up and provokes a response. zardiw is always posting that "JBI has contracts in place for all of it's output". I have asked him several times to prove it. He avoids answering. Now if people are so stupid as to believe somethign like that and buy stock based onit, there is nothing I nor anybody else can do to prevent that. But, what a stupid, dishonest statement. We have no idea what those contracts mean. To my knowledge, supply agreements are not necessarily for a set quantity. Companies likely establish relationships with any number of suppliers. The above cannot be proven, but it is a powerful statement and should be proven. To those that are that stupid as to believe it without question.... they would have trouble crossing a busy street.