Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1Coffeehound who wrote (22052)	4/8/2012 8:36:56 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

What do we have? No control tests of the catalyst. In fact, no mention of the catalyst by the "geniuses" at IsleChem. wEaReLeGiOn Sunday, April 08, 2012 6:00:41 PM Re: StockSnyper post# 175915 Post # of 175957 Really? Could you point out the results of the catalyst test(s). Here's what should be there- A control test with no catalyst. A control test with a leading catalyst. A control test with JBI's sooper-secret catalyst. Then the results of the 3 control tests. What do we have? No control tests of the catalyst. In fact, no mention of the catalyst by the "geniuses" at IsleChem. Why? Probably because the sooper-secret catalyst performed about as well as a leading catalyst. Why would I come to that conclusion? The lack of evidence showcased by Bordynuik and backed up by control test figures touting and proving that the sooper-secret catalyst is all that it's cracked up to be. Is there anything else that makes me think this? Sure there is. It's claimed that the sooper-secret catalyst needed to be tweaked because there were nasty elements contained in the original recipe. Is there any more reason for thinking this is the case? Sure there is. The evidence that Bordynuik has been tinker-farkin'n with the machine in an attempt to "get it there". Why do I think this? Look at the Florida deals that never happened. Look at the claims of what must be hundreds of these machines operating by now, if the stated goal of 2500 machines seven years out is to be realized. Are there any other reasons? Yep, Bordynuik seems to talk big, and deliver little.. and he hasn't been talking about the sooper-secret catalyst in a long time. I would think that IsleChem (being a testing laboratory) would not give a rat's ass what the cost of producing fuel costs - they are there to test the chemical/physical properties of the catalyst siliconinvestor.com