Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (129536)	4/9/2012 9:45:27 PM
From: joefromspringfield	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224759

Sorry Ken but I can't see where anyone in their right mind here in Florida would sit on a jury in a Zimmerman trial. If you decide to acquit him the Black Panthers will put a bounty on your head.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (129536)	4/9/2012 9:49:31 PM
From: tonto	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224759

Wow, she really should not be teaching.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (129536)	4/9/2012 9:56:53 PM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224759

Chavette Jackson has struggled with a question lately: How can she explain justice and criminal and constitutional law to high school students Have her ask the black panthers or the racist DOJ. They do whatever they please and nobody complains. As for constitutional law, tell her to stay away from you and Obama (THE TOTAL FAILURE)

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (129536)	4/9/2012 10:35:25 PM
From: MJ	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224759

Is Jackson, age 26 making a presumption based on the media and the internet just as many people jumped to conclusions based on what was being written and said. Jackson ask the question------- “How do you teach about the law when there has been no justice in this case?” said Jackson, 26. Answer to Jackson You don't teach about the law and make a premature assumption that the legal system is not working. You teach that there is a process that is conducted before a legal conclusion is reached , regardless of your personal opinions.