Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (25845)	4/11/2012 9:40:00 AM
From: SARMAN	3 Recommendations Respond to of 50280

Wow. You don't read or comprehend very well, do you? Thank you for your kind words. "Pulling the trigger" is NOT the issue. The issue is WHO attacked physically FIRST. Pretty simple. If the kid turned and did the attacking, then the shooting is justified, because someone who attacks with his fists could easily be assumed to kill if he were to take the gun from the person BEING ATTACKED FIRST! Even when provoked? Think man, think. As Slider posted, Americans are pitted against each other. Think man, think. How do you know the kill was not protecting his life? If the kid had taken the gun in the attack, it could have been the other way around. Again, the GUILTY party is the one who attacked physically FIRST. A vigilante with a gun on a power trip. Enough said. Why he became a vigilante, because he was turned down at the police academy. Think man, think. Stupid question to ask if you have the right to carry a weapon and kill those whose looks you do not like. He said nothing remotely like that. He said you have a right, with a permit, to carry a weapon legally, and IF ATTACKED, or IF someone is attempting to STEAL your property, then YES, you DO have the right to protect yourself or your property. So far all evidence and eye witness account, points to George initiating the confrontation. Was Trayvon stealing from George no, yet George decided to confront Trayvon. Why, because George was carrying a gun and he was on a power trip. Why didn't allow the police to handle it? Tattoos with a specific meaning tell a lot about who this kid was. I guess you do not have kid and you were never a teenager. You SHOULD care, just as you SHOULD care that the MSM is putting up photos trying to make him a choir boy, when that is not reality. The MSM and the POTUS are MAKING this a RACE issue ON PURPOSE. Hmm, nothing new, thus I do not care. I know the gullible would believe anything the media puts out, what's new? Why do they not put up accurate photos and post the FACTS, rather than baiting a low IQ mob with innuendo and made up BS? I'd tell you, but then you should do some thinking on your own. As I mentioned, your beef is not with Trayvon and George, your beef is with the Al Sharprons. Hint -- it's related to the 450 million rounds of ammo ordered by DHS recently. LOL a round for every American. Slider pointed it out in his post.