SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hdl who wrote (131686)4/11/2012 1:24:26 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 132070
 
Leftwing is the answer.



To: hdl who wrote (131686)4/12/2012 10:32:26 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike Tyson on George Zimmerman: ‘It’s a disgrace he hasn’t been shot yet’



By Dylan Stableford

Senior Media Reporter

Posts
  • Email
  • RSS

    By Dylan Stableford | The Lookout – 16 hrs ago

    [iframe class="yui3-widget-shim" title="Widget Stacking Shim" src="javascript:false" tabindex="-1" role="presentation" frameborder="0"][/iframe]

    New: Now the email button gives you a quick and easy way to start a conversation.



    Tyson (Isaac Brekken/AP)

    Mike Tyson thinks that George Zimmerman deserves violent retribution for the shooting of Trayvon Martin.

    In an interview with Yahoo News about his upcoming one-man show in Las Vegas, the former heavyweight champion sounded off on the polarizing case:

    "My personal feeling is that, as a young kid that was beat on by a bully, that was pretty much singled out—the guy [Zimmerman] stalked him, didn't follow instructions from a superior officer, when they said, 'Stop following the kid.' That tells you everything right there. But my all-around perspective, I wasn't there, I don't know what happened. But it's just so widespread and overt what happened. Even though this is the best country in the world, certain laws in this country are a disgrace to a nation of savages. It's a majority versus a minority. That's the way God planned it. He didn't want to do something about it, He wanted us to do something about it. And if we don't, it's gonna stay this way. We have to continue tweeting, we have to continue marching, we have to continue fighting for Trayvon Martin. If that's not the case, he was killed in vain, and we're just waiting for it to happen to our children. He'll have gotten away with impunity. It's a disgrace that man hasn't been dragged out of his house and tied to a car and taken away. That's the only kind of retribution that people like that understand. It's a disgrace that man hasn't been shot yet. Forget about him being arrested--the fact that he hasn't been shot yet is a disgrace. That's how I feel personally about it."

    In 1992, Tyson was convicted of raping Desiree Washington, a beauty pageant contestant, and served three years in prison.



    To: hdl who wrote (131686)4/12/2012 10:52:29 AM
    From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 132070
     
    For those who like studies: Masculine men more likely to be conservative, liberals more likely to be girly men


    Open Thread: Masculine Men Vote Republican?
    By Matthew Sheffield | April 12, 2012 | 09:45





    Today's starter topic: Are liberals more likely to be "girlie men?" According to a study out of Australia across a number of countries, men who are more masculine tend to be more likely to support conservative political ideologies.

    If that claim is true, does it mean that liberal men are less likely to be physically strong or have lower levels of testosterone? Somehow it seems unlikely you'll see a study touting this idea. But while we're waiting, here's the Daily Telegraph's summary of the masculine men study:

    Researchers cite muscle-bound Hollywood action heroes like Arnold Schwarzenegger, Chuck Norris and Sylvester Stallone as evidence that aggression is linked to conservative politics. [...]

    Researchers from Griffith University in Australia said the Hollywood examples were typical of a phenomenon among modern men with an aggressive side. They tend to build up their upper body strength and become subconsciously obsessed with their fighting ability, they told the journal Human Nature.

    Lead researcher Aaron Sell said men were 'designed for fighting' and the tougher they are, the more this influences their behaviour and attitudes.

    Men are better designed to respond rapidly to threats, avoid something that is thrown at them or be able to catch it, and are better at taking a punch, he said. [...]

    In political terms they tend to take the more right wing view - be it Conservative in the UK or Republican in the US.

    The researchers looked at the political attitudes of actors in Hollywood and found those who played action stars were more likely to support military action by the US overseas.

    The study said: "Those actors known for their physical strength and formidability, among them Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Chuck Norris and Sylvester Stallone, were more likely to support military action.

    "Generally speaking, Hollywood actors are left wing, but the action stars among them were more likely than not to support the Republican position on foreign policy.

    Does this idea make sense to you?

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2012/04/12/open-thread-masculine-men-vote-republican#ixzz1rpzz5L4i