Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pyslent who wrote (18843)	4/11/2012 7:48:42 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32680

Maybe you did not read the link... Was the iPhone worth it for Sprint? news.cnet.com Did Sprint Nextel really need the iPhone? That's what one Wall Street analyst is asking after looking at the company's year-end performance, which Sprint disclosed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday. The results show that a bulk of Sprint's customers would have joined the carrier regardless of whether the iPhone was available, and only a fraction of the customers would have left the service for the iPhone elsewhere. Sprint began carrying the iPhone in October. The numbers, while still early, fly in the face of Sprint's repeated comments that the iPhone is bringing a tangible benefit to the company, justifying the massive bet that executives have placed on it and Apple. Sprint CEO Dan Hesse has said he believes the iPhone both brings in new customers and reduce customer turnover, or churn, all while generating higher service revenue. The data from Sprint's filing, however, suggest the company wouldn't have fared as badly, and wouldn't have had to bear the expense of carrying the iPhone. "While these results are early in the game, and fourth-quarter handset upgrades will generate a churn benefit down the line, the initial results certainly don't increase our confidence that the iPhone will be accretive to Sprint," Barclays analyst James Ratcliffe said in a note. In the fourth quarter, the company posted a loss of $980 million, narrower than its year-earlier loss, but still significant. Much of that bottom-line hit came from subsidies paid out to Apple, which ensure the iPhone is sold at its more reasonable $200 price for the base model. While initially lauded as a coup for Sprint, there has been some recent backlash over fears that the company paid too high a price for its deal with Apple. One analyst suggested the move to LTE and the cost of carrying the iPhone could tip the company into bankruptcy. Hesse has gone out and defended the iPhone deal as a smart move for the company. Sprint isn't the only one affected. AT&T and Verizon both reported losses in the fourth quarter, partly due to the high cost that comes with carrying the iPhone. Those companies, however, are in a far better financial position than Sprint. Sprint has a number of costs to bear over the next few years. Beyond the expense of the iPhone, the company is building its own 4G LTE network, and may need to provide further funding to Clearwire, which supplies the current 4G WiMax network. Sprint has warned investors that the company would have to endure a trough with results over the next year or so. Many on Wall Street wonder if it has enough staying power to reach the turnaround phase of the plan.

To: pyslent who wrote (18843)	4/11/2012 7:49:56 PM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 32680

Samsung’s $249 Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 To Make U.S. Debut On April 22, We Go Hands-On techcrunch.com CHRIS VELAZCO posted 45 mins ago 1 Comments Samsung teased the masses this past February when they revealed that one of their first Ice Cream Sandwich-powered tablets would be the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, a decidedly mid-range device that seemed lacking in the style department. At the time, Samsung made it known that the Tab would arrive in the U.K. Before trickling down to the rest of the world, a plan that didn’t really pan out. These days, Samsung has been a bit more forthcoming with details for the U.S. market, and the company has just recently given me what I’ve been waiting for: a price and a release date. The Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 will officially launch in the United States on April 22 with a pretty enticing $249 price tag attached to it. I’ll be posting a more comprehensive review of the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 after I’ve gotten the chance to play with it for more than a day, but here are a few of a my first impressions. Despite having a slim plastic body, the Galaxy Tab 2 has a surprisingly solid feel to it. That’s not to say it’s particularly heavy — in fact, at 12.2 ounces it’s a shade lighter than Amazon’s Kindle Fire, which makes it very comfortable to hold with one hand. It’s also about as thick as the Kindle Fire, a fact that’s obscured rather well thanks to the device’s nicely-tapered edges. While I appreciate the Galaxy Tab’s build quality, there isn’t much to write home about when it comes to physical aesthetics. There’s no sex appeal to be found here, just lots of gray plastic and a few Samsung logos. As I noted when Samsung first announced this little guy, the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 doesn’t have the most impressive spec sheet you’ve ever seen. Nestled inside the Tab’s slim frame (and behind the 7-inch 1024 x 600 display) is a 1GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4430 processor, 1GB of RAM, the usual slew of WiFi and Bluetooth radios, an IR blaster, and 8GB of internal storage. If that’s just not enough space for you to work with, there’s also a microSD card slot capable of taking up to 32GB of additional storage embedded in the device’s left edge. Despite being outflanked by its cousin the Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus in terms of hardware, this little guy held up fairly well to my (admittedly unscientific) tests. It handled an extended bout of Minecraft without any major issues, and more graphically intensive games like Shadowgun were completely playable, if a bit jerky at times. Navigating through the device’s menus was generally nice and smooth, even after I loaded up my homescreens with a few of Samsung’s love-them-or-hate-them TouchWiz widgets. That said, I still ran into a few hiccups during my day of testing — I would occasionally be booted back to the homescreen while scrolling through my list of apps, and the keyboard would mysteriously disappear while I was trying to set up the Peel Smart Remote app for a little veg-out session on the couch. Tablets don’t always have the best luck when it comes to the cameras they’re graced with, and the 7-inch GalTab 2 doesn’t manage to buck the trend. It sports a 3-megapixel rear-facing camera, and a smaller VGA sensor right above its display, neither of which managed to blow me away. While I was in New York City meeting with Samsung to pick up the demo unit, I snapped this image in the Theatre District — it’s downright lousy, though it probably goes without saying that a tablet shouldn’t be your primary shooter. It goes without saying that the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 is no iPad killer (not that it’s meant to be), but its price tag and performance mean it could definitely give the Kindle Fire some competition for that number 2 spot. Sure, at $249, it isn’t quite as cheap as the Fire, but the difference in performance between the two is definitely noticeable, and barring any weird issues that could pop up over the next few days, I’d much rather own one of these. Tags: galaxy tab, samsung, Galaxy tab 2 7.0