Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cosigo Resources symbol CSG.v -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DoctorSolar who wrote (380)	4/12/2012 1:27:59 PM
From: 3bar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 717

There is a case study by Chesbar Resource on a project in Venezuela that shows MMI RR over a deposit . That is a classic for seeing the relationship of mass of ore to RR#s . Even higher grade ore right on surface does not give #s that a larger yet deeper mass gives . The difference in this case was a RR of 50 vrs one of 150 for the larger buried target . It was 35 m of 7.6 g/t ( aprox. ) at about 60 m deep plus a 25 m of 7.6 at 40 m and surface channels of 2.6 g/t . In both targets there was ore in channel sample on surface with the higher grades being in the lower RR . Channels of 2.6 g/t vrs 3.6 g/t over at least 25 m .