Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (22371)	4/13/2012 1:54:07 AM
From: PaperProphet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Steady_on, I think it's good that you're here since you're probably the only pro-JBII person on this board and your opinions add some diversity. If I could make an observation, though, you're a bit disingenuous. For example, when you said that Mr. Bordynuik said a processor was in continuous production and couldn't point to any evidence, or when you came up with the excuse that you choose to keep your communication with Mr. Bordynuik private without any rationale, it just makes you look like a liar. Those are old Zardiw tricks. I can understand that you want to convince people that JBII is the real deal so badly to where you're willing to resort to being disingenuous but there's no point in following the lead of Rawnoc, Zardiw and Brig. If you're genuine and have an argument that makes sense, people will probably listen to you. I know I would. If you can't come up with any cogent argument then it might actually mean that you're on the wrong side of that argument. Be yourself and be honest.

To: Steady_on who wrote (22371)	4/13/2012 9:10:54 AM
From: YAWN	Respond to of 53574

Here is what smells the most to me about JBII. If fuel can be produced for $10/ barrel as claimed. then why hasn't processor #1 been running flat out making an obscene profit margin on a commodity that needs absolutely no sales force? If the magic catalyst really worked as claimed, money would be raining on JBIs headquarters as offers to invest, buy processors, or buy out the company came flooding in. But for SOME reason, John decides to keep all vital information secret, and instead of running #1 to fund the construction of more processors, he decides to tweak and tweak and tweak and tweak . . . . . Either JB is profit phobic, or the magic catalyst is not as advertised. Either one is not good.

To: Steady_on who wrote (22371)	4/13/2012 9:23:37 AM
From: jimmenknee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

You do know that a pumper technique is to ignore everything you can't argue successfully and concentrate on what you think you can? Thank you for the last words. It is yet another discussion that ignores the primary issue-- misrepresenting VCs and IPOs in favor of supporting PPs and ignoring restriction periods. You seem to want readers to believe: VC-ers will dump at IPO opening yet PP-ers will hold after restriction expires. JBI is merely a victim of an NSS bear raid... but Agilyx deserves their dump should they IPO (I think you also would support they be shorted) But if you want to try to come to a mutual agreement on what honest and civil discussion is, we can