SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bob Markley who wrote (28283)11/24/1997 6:09:00 PM
From: RMF  Respond to of 35569
 
I don't think E.C. is posting anymore here, so Graystone and Lion and everybody else, why not leave these people alone.



To: Bob Markley who wrote (28283)11/24/1997 8:23:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Respond to of 35569
 
I just E-Mailed this to some pen pals and gals:
Hi, a friend called..a math wiz, for what it is worth..he has been adding figures and says that the INSTITUTIONS have not sold...so the large sharesholders are really just retail people like us and THEY are the ones selling. The smart ones, are ( IMO-I-his-O) are holding. I hope and wish that it is so. I met him and his Bro X at the AGM and I think they make sense ( The both of them called each other and reconfirmed the facts just now).
It made me feel more comfortable.
Chucaupt2(Yes, I pray it is so!!!)
P.S.- The one brother was a Verbal Wiz in grade school and beyond and the one that called was a Math Wiz since then ..and till now..That is why he does his self employed business thing !!! The Other Verbal bro does his thing and posts hear on some occassions. No it is not whom you think it is. Not unless you walked in THE Sulphur Pit in Black Rock North with us durring the pre AGM CL Tour!
P.P.S.- Haber was talked about on the cHIP thread about 3-4 months ago and JT hotline about that time: News from HL= Old Info..incorrect. BTW Haber is in New Jersey. Old news...Nice PICK..but SIers allready KNOW! HL don't know Kitty Litter!



To: Bob Markley who wrote (28283)11/24/1997 10:32:00 PM
From: Bruce McGaughey  Respond to of 35569
 
Bruce,

Since the 'net' is a 3 month ma (or is it a 3 wk ma?)& it stands @ O.O4, then this implies that they didn't leave in those last 3 wks of data,... unless mass exodus in the last wk then they are still holding thus leading credence to the take over theory??

Still we don't have any concept of how they compile these weekly numbers, or do we?

Bob

Bob- 3-mo net buying is just what it says. There has been a net
buying of 0.04 mill shares over the last 3 months.
The thing that got my attention was that there was a change in
this figure a couple of weeks ago from 1.84 mill shrs.
That would indicate 1.8 mill shares might have been sold
the week before the change in the numbers.
Al Vennix thinks this change may have been tied to something
Telescan did with the escrowed shares.
That particular week was a slow week and really I don't think
1.8 mil shares actually traded that week.
It's also important (IMHO) to note that we haven't lost any
institutions recently. We still have 21.
...BUT....these numbers from Telescan are so screwy, I wouldn't
waste much time worrying about them.
....And, no, we don't know how they compile them.