SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (651383)4/13/2012 11:21:43 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1580264
 
Reporter grills Obama over jet-set lifestyle Raises question about multiple trips while Americans struggle

4/13/2012
wnd.com

Barack Obama, who is known for jetting off to exotic vacations at taxpayers’ expense, often even sending his family on ahead – also at taxpayer expense, got a little testy when a reporter questioned him about the practice.

“I think most folks understand how hard I work and how hard this administration is working on behalf of the American people,” he said.

The comments came in an interview with Larry Conners of KMOV-St. Louis, who asked: “The economy is a big issue and concern for folks. I mean, the unemployment, trying to make ends meet, gas prices, food prices going up. Some of our viewers are complaining, they get frustrated, even angered, when they see the first family jetting around, different vacations and so forth, sometimes maybe they think under color of state business and that you’re out of touch, that you don’t really know what they’re experiencing right now.”

Obama tried to minimize the question, “Well, I don’t know how many viewers you’re talking about that say that.”

“We do hear from some,” Conners said.

“I hear from all kinds of viewers about everything,” Obama said.

“I’m sure you do,” the reporter said.

“The fact of the matter is I think if you look at my track record, I’m raising a family here. When we travel through Service Service and Air Force One, that’s not my choice. I think most folks understand how hard I work and how hard this administration is working on behalf of the American people.”

The reporter noted that Obama “side-stepped that question.”

“No one is questioning his need to travel on Air Force One or have security. The questions being raised are the first family taking so many vacations, when and where, at taxpayer expense.”

That issue made headlines temporary just days ago when one of Obama’s daughters took a trip to Mexico, accompanied by dozens of security officers. The White House reportedly asked news outlets not to report on the trip.

Before that, according to the Washington Examiner, the Obamas had taken 16 vacations at taxpayer expense.

They include a President’s Day 2012 ski trip to Colorado, an extended stay in Hawaii at Christmas 2011, a Martha’s Vineyard, Mass., vacation during summer of 2011, a trip to Africa and Botswana in June 2011, another Colorado ski vacation on President’s Day 2011, Christmas 2011 for an extended trip to Hawaii.

Before that it was Florida, Chicago, Spain, Martha’s Vineyard again, Mount Desert Island, Maine, Chicago, New York City, Hawaii, Yellowstone National Park, Grand Canyon and Martha’s Vineyard again.

The report defended the Obama trips, citing 30 visits President Bush made to his Texas ranch.

“But his have become more controversial because of the costs associated with moving the first family to a public vacation spot, unlike the Bushes to their remote ranch in Crawford, Texas. For example, the Hawaii Reporter said the first family’s 2011 Christmas vacation in Hawaii would exceed $1.5 million.”

The report continued, “Critics and even some in his own party say the vacations present a bad image at a time when many Americans are struggling to get by during the recession.”

The Examiner cited a Harris poll revealing only three on 10 Americans say they plan to take a vacation lasting longer than a week over six months.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (651383)4/14/2012 12:03:32 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580264
 
Would you hire a known drug (or alcohol) addict to your CPA practice?

Would you let a surgeon operate on you if you knew he or she was a drug (or alcohol) addict?

Would you feel comfortable with the driver of an 18-wheeler tailgating you and being high on meth?<?I>

Any of these people, addicted to pain medication, MAY be able to function well. It depends on the nature and extent of the addiction. Meth, coke or heroin, no. Marijuana (if you could be addicted to marijuana)? Sure -- as long as it didn't interfere with the quality of the work product.

I just think you have to consider it on a case-by-case basis. If you think all drug addicts are laying around in gutters in downtown SFO you really don't understand the problem. There are plenty of high-functioning Oxy addicts. As I previously pointed out, Limbaugh was addicted for a long time before getting caught, speaking to an audience of ~20 Million daily, and nobody knew it.

It's one thing to allow people to screw up their own lives. It's yet another thing to deny they're screwing up anyone else's lives.

That's true and if any of the people you mentioned were screwing up other people's lives then they don't need to be working, they need to be in treatment. They sure as hell don't automatically need to be in prison.