Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (25213)	4/19/2012 12:20:16 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 69300

Someone who pretends not to read what my posts shouldn't keep mentioning me and where he thinks I live.

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (25213)	4/19/2012 3:46:31 PM
From: LLCF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Last year Brummy seemed to embrace evolution in the form of "Intelligent Design"... of course that acceptance depends on the premise of the latest article he finds in support of any his disjointed beliefs on various topics. :) DAK

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (25213)	4/20/2012 5:12:06 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

repost : In the general area of support for Common Descent & Tree of Life there is an important trend... as more species are added to analyses and as more genes are sequenced for those species, the phylogenetic trees are becoming more clearly resolved with fewer and fewer conflicts. The vertebrate tree of life is an excellent example in this & here Thomson and Shaffer 2010 discuss this: biomedcentral.com So far so good ...the more data we collect we find more supporting evidence every day for the theory of Evolution & the Tree of life and the rest is noise by clowns on the sidelines