Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (652125)	4/20/2012 2:52:05 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583344

he didn't kill bin laden the seals did because of the ground work laid out by Bush and he hasn't done shit to help the economy

To: puborectalis who wrote (652125)	4/20/2012 2:55:11 PM
From: i-node	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583344

>> incorrecto ....killing Bin Laden and avoiding a financial meltdown is titanic compared to Mitt's accomplishments. Bin Laden would have been killed by any president who was in office at the time, simply, because the president didn't do anything but say, "Yeah, I want you to kill the most hated person on Earth if you get the chance." Do you think Romney wouldn't have done the same, or GWB? It isn't like Obama actually DID anything. As to the financial meltdown, GWB had already solve the problem when Obama took office. And in fact, most people understand that obama made the problem worse by burning a trillion dollars of our children's money during his first money in office. Obama has blamed Bush for pretty much everything. People are sick of hearing it, and Romney can ram that down his throat. I can see a picture of the "The Buck Stops Here" sign on the presidential desk followed by quote after quote blaming Bush and everyone else for his failures.