Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (87512)	4/22/2012 4:42:27 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

<<But scientists can prove AGW which is why 99% believe in it. <<They can? Guess there's no more reason to fund their research then, right?>> Faulty logic. That is the basic problem with your thinking. You do not follow through with ideas Knowing AGW is true, does not mean they know everything about it. Climatology is very complicated. They need to continue to study it forever considering the potential is mass extinction like during the Permian age. They know quantum physics is true and evolution, but they do not know very much about how either works, only that the central thesis is true and the equations always work. <<I, and others far more qualified than myself, remain less convinced that GW is ENTIRELY DUE to Anthropogenic sources.>> With all due respect, you are simply not qualified to judge. One has to go with the top PHD atmospheric chemists and climatologists. A family doctor is not qualified to do brian surgery either. <<Btw, a large percentage of atmospheric scientists once believed we were on the verge of a major ice age.. I think that was just about 40 years ago.. Hmmm....>> Immaterial. Our science has advanced light years in the last 40 years e.g. the internet! koan