SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : For the Sake of Clarity and Meaning -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (758)4/27/2012 8:43:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 777
 
Cognitive Bias of the Day: The Framing Effect
March 22nd, 2012 · 1 Comment · Critical Thinking

The framing effect is a cognitive bias that occurs when the way in which an option is presented can alter people’s decisions.

For example, this Bleeding Heart Libertarians post by Matt Zwolinski conveys the results of an experiment described in Thomas Schelling’s Choice and Consequence, on the subject of child tax exemptions.
Schelling told his students that a standard exemption is allowed for each child, and that the amount of the exemption is independent of the taxpayer’s income. He asked their opinion of the following proposition: should the child exemption be larger for the rich than for the poor?

Almost all of the students said that it should not.

Then Schelling pointed out that the tax code could have been constructed differently, so that it included a built-in exemption assuming two children as the default, and then imposed a surcharge on those who have fewer than two.

He then asked:
Should the childless poor pay as large a surcharge as the childless rich?

The students answered no.

As Matt Zwolinski notes,

Our intuitions say that the rich should not receive a higher credit than the poor, but that they should pay a higher surcharge. But as Schelling pointed out, “surcharge” and “credit” are just two different ways of describing the same thing, a purely verbal distinction created by an arbitrary choice about how many children we assume as the baseline case. So what our intuitions are telling us to do – have the rich pay a higher surcharge but receive a lower credit – is logically impossible.

This illustrates that simple moral rules — e.g., when in doubt, favor the poor — do not always (or necessarily even often!) work reliably.

thethinkerblog.com