Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert b furman who wrote (31314)	4/25/2012 7:01:10 PM
From: architect*	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222671

I hear you! My 90 year old father is cheering for GM and Chrysler? He would say that if Pontiac was still making cars like the 1965 GTO, people wouldn't be buying Subaru's, or Tata's. I'm still driving 1979 Mercedes-Benz today, since my first one in 1980. I'm not sure how that fits into the equation, other than in 1979 Mercedes Benz produced good value. China and India, in years to come, with a combined population of 3 billion, could be buying billions of new cars and I-phones.

To: robert b furman who wrote (31314)	4/25/2012 9:27:50 PM
From: 3bar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222671

Bob historically Unions are a positive when an economy is in its early growth as Capital is looking for yield . The individual needs to be protected . As an economy matures the unions play a role like Capital does when things are getting started . Bullies . That is what we see but it is not totally that simple .