SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Zitel-ZITL What's Happening -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cuemaster who wrote (13020)11/24/1997 11:57:00 PM
From: Russian Bear  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18263
 
Cuemaster,

The chief differences between shorting a stock and buying an equivalent number of puts are:

1. You must pay a time premium for the puts. Even if they are well in the money, you will pay a small time premium, as well as the exagerated bid/ask spread inherrent in trading the less-liquid and nominally-cheaper derivative instruments.

2. Options have expiration dates. Even if you are right about the direction of a stock, you could lose all your money because of a miscalculation of just a few days. Literally. Shorting allows you the luxury of pursuing the "sell and hold" strategy, provided you have the margin reserves necessary to withstand the fluctuations.

3. The purchase of options limits your maximum loss to the amount invested. Selling stock short leaves you vulnerable to a greater (theoretically unlimited) loss.

4. Short stock can be "called in" by your broker (uncommon, but possible,) thus closing out your position prematurely, and against your wishes. Options are yours until you sell them, exercize them, or they expire, whichever comes first.

5. Options allow you to leverage your position, sometimes very greatly. Thus, if you are right (*very* right,) you could win big (several hundred, or even thousand, percent.) Note: doing this is mathematically possible, but highly unlikely.

6. Options strategies are many and varied: various spreads, straddles, strangles, hedges, etc. Selling short, by contrast, is much more straight-forward.

7. Buyers of "premium" are usually losers. This is not simply my observation: there are statistics on this phenomenon, and they are not encouraging to the prospective option buyer.

8. Stock may not always be available to short, but an arbitrarily large number of put contracts can be "written" at any given strike.

As a general rule of thumb, if you are undecided between selling a stock short and going long its puts, keep in mind that buying the puts is safer (less "downside" variance,) but also less efficatious (lower expected value of return.)

There are many books and reference materials available. Rather than post vague information on them ("the mind is the first thing to go," they say,) I will let someone else provide suitable titles and/or links.

I hope this helps. Good luck,
RB



To: cuemaster who wrote (13020)11/25/1997 7:32:00 AM
From: Allan F  Respond to of 18263
 
cuemaster,

I mean no disrespect, but do you really feel safe owning an investment instrument you do not fully understand?

Another thing to consider, it was already mentioned that with options one pays for "time." Short selling is the opposite in that if you have the collateral shorting incurs no out-of-pocket expense, (until you cover or run out of collateral) an aspect I like very much. One can create his own hedge fund for nothing.

-Allan