Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (652893)	4/26/2012 4:07:22 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578983

Inode, > At any rate, I believe any employer who wants to drug test any employee for any reason ought to have that right, and ought to be able to fire the employee for refusing to submit. Well it won't be long before said employer gets sued by the fired employee. The judge's ruling only applied to state workers, but it can easily set a precedent for banning drug testing done by employers in the private sector. > I also believe there is no way in hell marijuana legalization would result in anywhere near the misery inflicted by its prohibition. I haven't been made "miserable" by the prohibition of pot. I know you have, but those are the consequences of messing with that s--t. Get rid of the consequences and watch that s--t turn into a right, then an entitlement. Sound far-fetched? Maybe just as far-fetched as a judge saying the state of Florida can't drug test their workers. Oops ... Tenchusatsu