SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (652948)4/26/2012 10:37:28 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1579130
 
>> Bush isn't stupid, but he isn't all that book-smart, either.

I don't know about "book smart". But I don't think he would, in his wildest blunder, have made the kind of comment Obama (the "intellectual constitutional law professor") made during that open-mic blunder.

Personally, though, I think "book-smart" is over-rated.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (652948)4/27/2012 7:44:34 AM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Respond to of 1579130
 
Being able to order in French got Kerry TWO megarich wives and kept him from having to work for a living.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (652948)4/27/2012 11:46:48 AM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579130
 
Thinking, Religion Don't Mix: Study

ANALYTICAL THOUGHT TENDS TO DROWN OUT FAITH, RESEARCHER FINDS

By Kevin Spak, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Apr 27, 2012 9:09 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – People prone to analytical thinking are less prone to religious faith, a new study has concluded. Scientists have long believed that analytical thinking can override one's intuitive responses, and studies have shown that religion is rooted in intuitive thought. So Canadian researcher Will Gervais set out to see if analytical thought could override religion, the LA Times reports. First he gave a group of students a test whose questions were designed to have an intuitive-but-wrong answer and a correct one requiring more thought to arrive at.

(Example: "A bat and a ball cost $1.10 total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much is the ball?" If you said 10 cents, try again.) Students were then surveyed on their religious beliefs, and those who had aced the test scored their faith lower than those who'd failed. Other experiments sought to trigger analytical thinking—either by showing subjects specific words, or forcing them to read small text—to see if that would actually reduce belief; in each case, it appeared to.