SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Eutro ( EUTO ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Novice Bob who wrote (1764)11/24/1997 11:53:00 PM
From: Judith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12043
 
Robert,

Please define how you read discomfort and fear about the company in my previous post? "Did you detect stress in my words" about the company or about the email? I am responding to the email received. I have had no problem with my interaction with Brad, and expect to call him again if I choose to gain further information about my investment, regardless of what Jim or anyone else advises.

Your response is so typical of many here. If someone disagrees with what or how someone says something, then just tell them to sell and move on. You don't know me at all, so to state that this is not my kind of stock is a bit presumptious on your part. And the decision when to sell is mine, I don't need you to tell me to "sell and move on". Your group may have $150,000, I have invested $23,000 in this stock and I am not a group. And I even think I have held this stock longer than you.

Thanks for your attempt at telling me what stocks to invest my money in, but I have managed just fine so far without your input.

Judith



To: Novice Bob who wrote (1764)11/25/1997 12:18:00 AM
From: stockid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12043
 
OFF TOPIC: Dear God can you please send me a stock that I can be one hundred percent sure about and be comfortable with. P.S. Can you guarantee 35% or more.

Dear Investor dream on.

With Rewards come risk.

SK



To: Novice Bob who wrote (1764)11/25/1997 2:09:00 AM
From: CJacks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12043
 
Have to agree with Judith, she's got a good point. I don't think it was very positive for James to basically state that Brad will only give certain people, in the "Know", information. If James is getting that information, that's fine, but I will have to say that the way it was presented was not in the best light. Not slamming you James, you seem to be the kind of person that would realize your e-mail could've been better presented and would change it if you could. I'm mainly writing this response to slam Novice Bob.

Bob, there is absolutely no reason to go off on Judith. Did you really read her e-mail? I don't believe she was slamming James either, she did say "Perhaps your intentions were good, but somehow the way you presented it can be interpreted negatively." And show me where she gave an indication that she was "fearful?" And how do you know what her "kind of stock" is?

Bob, relax man, I don't disagree that some people know more than others in the "real world." And I don't have anything at all against that. But insiders shouldn't flaunt the fact that they are given information that others stockholders cannot get or promote the fact that the company, yes Brad, is giving out information to some and not others. It could have been better presented. PERIOD!

Fire away if you wish, but that's my opinion.

GO EUTO!

Chris