Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dvdw© who wrote (89706)	5/4/2012 5:07:03 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Respond to of 218887

Oil was, in an earlier life, marine sediment, which was then trundled along under the ocean to the subduction zones, where it was taken hundreds of kilometres down into a super high pressure cooker, at lava temperatures, where it was separated from heavier goop, then floated up through other sedimentary layers including zeolite clays, which formed it into the multitude of compounds from methane to heavy stuff, stuck in the ground under impermeable layers, waiting for Gaia to invent people, to drill it out and release it back into the ecosphere. The Thomas Gold and the accumulating marine sediment in situ theories are both wrong. My subduction theory from 1981 remains the only sensible explanation for all the facts. The evil-doing Greens are opposing Gaia and want the carbon to be left buried in its vast graveyards of gas, liquids, coal and limestone. The Greens don't realize how subtle the Devil is - they have been seduced into doing the evil work of destroying Gaia. The Greens mistakenly think that humans are not part of Gaia's cunning plan. Even Lovelock [Mr Gaia] is starting to realize that the Greens are barking up the wrong tree regarding Greenhouse Effect Global Warming. [I am not actually a fan of anthropomorphizing Earth and the Ecosphere, but it's fun] Mqurice