SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (485606)5/3/2012 9:30:55 PM
From: Nadine Carroll2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794176
 
Why are they not terrified by what would be the consequences of NOT attacking bin Laden? The answer is obvious - they would keep it a secret that they ever had such an opportunity. The truth would leak out 10 years from now, in someone's memoirs.

The very fact that Obama thought it was a good idea to get Bill Clinton to second him, when Clinton had muffed his chance to get bin Laden (not so secretly either) testifies to the truth of this.



To: skinowski who wrote (485606)5/4/2012 2:49:57 AM
From: MJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794176
 
Why is Clinton pandering to Obama? Does he think Hillary becomes the VP nominee?

Clinton just keeps reviving himself--------I don't know which is the biggest scoundrel Clinton or Obama.