Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (19133)	5/5/2012 7:27:54 AM
From: kidl	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24928

You could have just said "Yes, I want energy security but not in my backyard".

To: axial who wrote (19133)	5/5/2012 10:03:44 AM
From: teevee	Respond to of 24928

No one doubts the earthquake and tsunami hazards, but they are also site specific: canadiangeographic.ca You can be sure earthquake and tsunami risks have been studied in depth for site selection. The headwaters of Whale Channel at Kitimat look to be one of the safest spots available. Extending your logic, all economic activity within 50 meters elevation of tidewater should not be allowed. What about marinas, jetty's, coastal cities and towns, commercial and residential building, mills, etc? What about the shoreline economic activity in Burrard inlet, including the refinery and oil loading terminal at Port Moody? I believe we will have to agree to disagree.