SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: axial who wrote (19147)5/7/2012 9:02:50 AM
From: teevee2 Recommendations  Respond to of 24928
 
axial,
Great article. I would prefer to see an all Canadian route for pipeline(s) to the east, even if it is more expensive, for reasons of national economic security. History tells us that when the USA can stick it to Canada, they do so. I can envision some kind of tax or "transit surcharge" put on Canadian oil transiting the USA because they can. Good fences make for good neighbours.



To: axial who wrote (19147)5/8/2012 5:01:11 PM
From: westslope1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24928
 
axial: I'm not opposed to a privately financed and managed bitumen pipeline to eastern Canada.

But I am opposed to a government-subsidized pipeline.

If you are swayed by the TransCanada's CEO's rhetoric, good for you. If you think retrofitting the existing natural gas pipeline can be done cost effectively. Good for you. I'm not.

Can you and others debate this without behaving in a sleazy manner? If not, count me out.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News