Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Turnarund Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bankbuyer who wrote (1038)	5/7/2012 10:39:45 PM
From: Covenant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1876

And PRAA was the company that didn't hire him as a security guard? At least they did one thing right. The technicals for HMPR have been improving, moving from strong sell to sell. HMPR may be establishing a base, but it is still too early to tell. Fundamentals supporting a higher price are still missing.

To: bankbuyer who wrote (1038)	5/7/2012 10:43:50 PM
From: Good Fundamentals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1876

HMPR is still in business. I have yet to see a nice short squeeze. Its wishful thinking on our parts but the "system" is rigged to prevent short squeezes - that's why GS forced Copper River out of the game - actually doing Copper River a favor but customers can be ungrateful. CWBS had fraud with one of its customers who had bank employees helping the customer. Small and large banks are subject to external and internal fraud. Many Tidewater locals think that the feds are using customers as scapegoats for the CWBS bank failure.