Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486193)	5/8/2012 2:37:15 PM
From: KLP	3 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793895

DOWN with Sierra Club, and all others like them. First they come for oil, then they come for nuclear, then coal, and now natural gas..... Are these guys and gals all Muslim and from Century 700? Do they want no energy? I wonder how many of these people even know that electricity is made from coal, nuclear and oil? I personally view natural gas as our energy future...... Stands to reason that the communist and socialist groups wouldn't like that.....

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486193)	5/8/2012 2:38:47 PM
From: Bridge Player	Respond to of 793895

Re: Sierra Club anti-oil, gas, solar, wind, and nuclear. A stepdaughter living in Nigeria as a missionary mentioned one time that using dried human waste as fuel, as is sometimes practiced in some of the villages there, does have a couple of advantages. Namely, pretty low fuel costs and the avoidance of all that expense for sewage systems. I think the Sierra Club should send over an expedition to see how that might best be brought back to the U.S. Doesn't matter anyway, since I understand that Exxon is just a few years now from having one-third of the entire land area of the United States cultivating algae, which should provide enough fuel to replace the coal-fired power plants about to be taken out of production.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486193)	5/8/2012 2:52:49 PM
From: skinowski	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793895

Hard to understand what those Sierra guys want... They are against coal, oil, nukes, gas, hydro - and now they are having second thoughts about wind. The only way this can make sense is if their real, underlying agenda is... population control. You can't keep 7 billion humans alive and "energized" on solar alone. Solar is very expensive, including the energy it takes to build it. I get it -- their agenda must be racist. They want to rid the world of poor people and poor nations.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486193)	5/8/2012 3:59:13 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793895

No Birth Certificate Required Pro-Choice White House Requires Registration of Unborn Children for Tours BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff - May 8, 2012 1:11 pm freebeacon.com The White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour, according to documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. White House Visitors Office director Ellie Schafer sent an email to a Capitol Hill staffer Tuesday morning explaining the process for registering an unborn fetus for a White House tour: We have received a number of calls regarding how to enter security information for a baby that has not yet been born. Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour. It’s an easy process. LAST NAME: The family’s last name FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we’ll ask you to update it at the time of birth SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero’s (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!) CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parents

To: Brumar89 who wrote (486193)	5/9/2012 2:35:44 AM
From: Neeka	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793895

It's interesting none of these writers ever mention wood as an alternative fuel because that is exactly what a lot of people would use if the Sierra Club had their way. No one ever asks them if they've thought that scenario through or how they'd feel if whole forests are destroyed in the process. The people at the Sierra Club are down right nuts and are not serious. They shouldn't even be given a spot at the table. The honest answer to our energy problems lies in using all of America's energy resources: coal; oil; natural gas; wind; solar; hydro; and nuclear. Not limiting ourselves, but wisely seeing how each energy source fits in the marketplace and the environment, will protect jobs and ensure we have enough affordable energy to keep America moving.