SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (71545)5/8/2012 4:22:07 PM
From: Mad22 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
WSJ Online
POTOMAC WATCH April 26, 2012, 7:50 p.m. ET
Strassel: The President Has a List
Barack Obama attempts to intimidate contributors to Mitt Romney's campaign.
By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office,
so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.
Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His
campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for "betting against America," and accuses you of having a
"less-than-reputable" record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can
indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake
donating that money.
Are you worried?
Richard Nixon's "enemies list" appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust.
Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to
bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is
de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully
avoided the practice.
Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item
entitled "Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney's donors." In the post, the Obama campaign named and
shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having "less-thanreputable
records," the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that "quite a few" have also been
"on the wrong side of the law" and profiting at "the expense of so many Americans."
These are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox, investors who the site outed for the crime of having
"outsourced" jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon
(a hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a "lobbyist") and Thomas O'Malley (an energy CEO) stand accused of
profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot, the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a "bitter foe of the gay
rights movement."
These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one
Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or
customers, use the Order Reprints tool at the bottom of any article or visit www.djreprints.com
POTOMAC WATCH April 26, 2012, 7:50 p.m. ET
Strassel: The President Has a List
Barack Obama attempts to intimidate contributors to Mitt Romney's campaign.
By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
Strassel: The President Has a List - WSJ.com 4/27/12 11:42 AM
online.wsj.com Page 2 of 3
Associated Press/The News & Observer
Barack Obama at the University of North Carolina,
April 24
Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly
assaulting them.
"We don't tolerate presidents or people of high power to do
these things," says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor
general. "When you have the power of the presidency—the
power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA,
the SEC—what you have effectively done is put these guys'
names up on 'Wanted' posters in government offices." Mr.
Olson knows these tactics, having demanded that the 44th
president cease publicly targeting Charles and David Koch of
Koch Industries, which he represents. He's been ignored.
The real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges,
is that they have given money to Mr. Romney. This fundraiser
of a president has shown an acute appreciation for the power of
money to win elections, and a cutthroat approach to
intimidating those who might give to his opponents.
He's targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who oppose his policies might
face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech
and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White
House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as
a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans.
Or they could quit donating to the GOP—Mr. Obama's real aim.
The White House has couched its attacks in the language of "disclosure" and the argument that corporations
should not have the same speech rights as individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation,
"he's doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his policies." Any giver, at any level, risks
reprisal from the president of the United States.
It's getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super PACs are helping the GOP
to level the playing field against Democratic super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr.
Romney. The White House's new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his donors) as it
seeks to frighten others out of giving.
The Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to "hold the eventual
Republican nominee accountable," but this is a dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that
transcend those of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that gives every
American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If
Mr. Obama isn't going to act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn't deserve to be one.
Write to kim@wsj.com