SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 9:39:08 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
That might get him some votes Kenneth, however it isn't so.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 9:47:19 AM
From: Hope Praytochange3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
sh*thead kennytroll where were markets on Friday ????



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 9:50:38 AM
From: Hope Praytochange5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 9:58:49 AM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Now I see why you LYING LIBERALS are getting so HYSTERICAL..........

Much as Mitt Romney seems to be pulling away from President Obama, Scott Walker is pulling away from Tom Barrett, the Democrats’ choice to oppose Walker in the recall election coming up on June 5. Walker beat Barrett in 2010, so this will be a rematch. Given the success of Walker’s policies, it is hard to imagine how Barrett can do much better this time, no matter how big a money advantage the Democrats have. With Walker gaining ground in the polls, the Democrats are getting desperate. So now we have an “independent” filmmaker releasing heavily-edited footage that he shot in 2011


I Don’t Know About Dividing, But Walker Is Going To Conquer

powerlineblog.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 10:02:04 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224718
 
Can you comment on the story that I heard that young Obama, while in Indonesia, was seen with his friends tying the tails of cats together and throwing them over a clothesline to see them fight?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 10:23:51 AM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224718
 
Obama assaulted a young fat black girl, no doubt about it, he admitted to it. Why doesn't the wash post track her down ?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 10:26:10 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Obama revealed info on that new underwear bomb case, that's treason. Ken what's the penalty for treason ?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 10:27:42 AM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Romney, the homophobic bully, committed an assault on the young man.

Are you saying that these old school records were NOT hidden and sealed and the press had access to them?

What a novel idea.......................

I imagine you will be supporting equal access to ALL school records, am I correct?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 10:39:09 AM
From: Hope Praytochange4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 11:10:53 AM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Speaking of bullying, I'm sure that you approve of these THUG tactics. It seems to have worked, and it is a dirty shame that you and your FAILED Muslim president can stoop so low.


Businessman Says He Lost Hundreds of Customers After Attacks by Obama Campaign

Businessman Frank Vandersloot, the CEO of Melaleuca, has been targeted by the Obama campaign after donating money to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign. "Three weeks ago, an Obama campaign website, 'Keeping GOP Honest,' took the extraordinary step of publicly naming and assailing eight private citizens backing Mr. Romney," Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal reported. "Titled 'Behind the curtain: a brief history of Romney's donors,' the post accused the eight of being 'wealthy individuals with less-than-reputable records.' Mr. VanderSloot was one of the eight, smeared particularly as being 'litigious, combative and a bitter foe of the gay rights movement.'"

The attacks are working. Vandersloot revealed in an interview on Fox News that his business practice is being hurt by the attacks from the Obama team.

weeklystandard.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 1:28:49 PM
From: longnshort4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Muslim Rape, Liberal/Left Complicity
by Paul Weston


The liberal/left need to take a long hard look themselves in the wake of the appalling Muslim gang rape revelations. I don’t blame the Muslims particularly, they are simply living by the 7th century rules of a desert warrior, but I do blame the liberal/left for quite literally enabling the brutal rape and violation of our children.

All you liberal/leftists are complicit in these crimes against humanity. You could have stopped it years ago, but you deliberately chose not to.

The BBC, The Guardian, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Child Protection Agency, the Politically Correct Police Service: I accuse you and the entire liberal establishment of deliberately covering up the multiple rapes and ruined lives of countless vulnerable young girls because of your utterly immoral and obscene attitude toward your own people, and your cowardly appeasement of a religious and political ideology that sanctions the violation of non-Muslim females.

Even now, when the facts are presented before us, you tell us it is not a Muslim problem, nor apparently a racial problem, unless of course you happen to be a vaguely all-encompassing Asian. But no amount of politically correct liberal/left evasion can disguise reality, and reality confirms the overwhelming culture of these paedophile rapists to be Islamic, and the overwhelming race of the majority of the victims to be indigenous British girls.

And this is not just a one-off case. It’s not only in Britain where this sort of thing happens, because the multiple gang rapes of indigenous girls by Muslims is replicated in every country where Muslims co-exist with non-Muslims:

  • There is a rape epidemic in Oslo. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Norwegian Girls.
  • There is a rape epidemic in Malmö. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Swedish girls.
  • There is a rape epidemic in Copenhagen. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Danish girls.
  • There is a rape epidemic in Sydney. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslims, the vast majority of the victims are Australian girls.

I think we can safely say, then, that it is indeed a matter of one particular religion, Islam, rather than the liberal/left’s obscene portrayal of it as simply an Asian problem, and it is indeed a racial problem when the victims are overwhelmingly native Europeans.

Thirteen separate towns and cities have been identified in Britain where this has been happening, and it now turns out the authorities have known about it since the early 1990s. In other words hundreds, possibly thousands of vulnerable and under-age British girls have been raped and both physically and psychologically damaged for life, with at least two taking their own lives, because the liberal/left refuse to accept the reality of Islam.

What is worse, even when the whole disgusting issue is dragged into the limelight, they still refuse to recognise that Islam is a supremacist ideology. But Islam considers non-Muslims to be second class citizens, and Islam considers women to be second class citizens. Infidel females therefore can be raped with impunity in the House of War — a Koranic label for all parts of the world which are not ruled by Islam.

On BBC Radio 4 this morning John Humphrey’s suggested that by identifying the rapists as Pakistani Muslims rather than just Asians was to give ammunition to the right-wing. So the BBC continues to cover up the brutality of Muslim gang rape rather than the face the reality of the modern Britain produced by malignant and catastrophic left-wing ideology. By doing this the BBC — overwhelmingly a feminist organisation — is complicit in the rape of our children.

Years of indoctrination by the liberal left have produced policemen with no sense of their duty to protect the most vulnerable in society. Politically Correct police chiefs have no morals, no decency, no empathy. They are now driven by the fear of being labelled racist, apparently a far worse crime than racist gang paedophilia.

And the worse thing here is that I can guarantee not one policeman will lose his job, even after they admitted they wilfully ignored the ongoing abuse carried out on their watch in the interest of some sort of perverted community cohesion. The British police are now more than just a disgrace, they are a stain on the history of this country.

The left-wing Politically Correct indoctrination that has enabled these shameful events means one thing and one thing only: By deliberately ignoring crimes against humanity and subsequently seeking to disguise these crimes, the liberal/left have lost their very own humanity, along with their morals and their souls.

If they had any basic common decency they would be ashamed of themselves, but I don’t think they are. Despite facilitating genuine evil and wickedness their prime concern now is to hang on to their jobs and seek to halt the rise of what they term the “right wing” — you know, those nasty people labelled racist — when they drew attention to Muslim gang rape over a decade ago.

But they cannot stop us. We are rising only because the public are awakening to the results of all that the liberal left stand for. There is good and evil in this world and the liberal left is evil. Betraying your country via mass immigration and Multiculturalism is bad enough, but to betray, and to continue to betray your own children is simply a step beyond the comprehension of all decent people, and no amount of liberal/left propaganda and evasion can alter this one simple fact. For the first time in a very long time I feel deeply ashamed to be part of a country that you, the liberal left, have produced.




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 5:13:59 PM
From: Ann Corrigan8 Recommendations  Respond to of 224718
 
Obama,the incompetent President,has assaulted all Americans by devastating their economy - thereby totally obliterating the creation of jobs.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132401)5/12/2012 5:48:41 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224718
 
Prosecution Rests After Presenting Video of Edwards’s Lies About His Affair By KIM SEVERSON Published: May 10, 2012


    GREENSBORO, N.C. — Prosecutors rested their case against former Senator John Edwards on Thursday, offering as their last piece of evidence a national television interview he did in 2008 in which he denied much about the affair that ultimately brought him to the federal courtroom here.

    Related
  • Edwards Jury Is Told How Wife Was Torn(May 10, 2012)
  • Speechwriter Recounts Edwards’s Decision to Come Clean About Child From Affair(May 9, 2012)
  • Patron’s Contributions and Their Intent Are Focus at Edwards Trial(May 8, 2012)



      Connect With Us on Twitter Follow @NYTNational for breaking news and headlines.

      Twitter List: Reporters and Editors

      Watching Mr. Edwards watch himself lie was the most electric moment yet in a three-week trial that has been relatively light on federal campaign law and heavy on dramatic narrative.

      Mr. Edwards, 58, faces six counts of conspiracy and violating campaign laws. The Department of Justice contends he illegally used at least $925,000 in money from two wealthy donors to hide his mistress and their child as he pursued the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

      The actual amount spent keeping the affair from his family and the public is well over a million dollars, but the government is focusing only on money spent until he suspended his campaign at the end of January 2008.

      The affair had begun a couple of years earlier, but remained largely a rumor. The National Enquirer ran an article in October 2007 about the affair that was ignored by other news media. But when it published a photograph of Mr. Edwards holding his baby in a Beverly Hills hotel, the story took on a new life.

      Instead of admitting it, Mr. Edwards allowed an aide to claim paternity. The aide, Andrew Young, then took his own family and Mr. Edwards’s pregnant mistress, Rielle Hunter, on the run, eventually ending up renting a mansion for about $20,000 a month in Santa Barbara, Calif. The baby, Frances Quinn Hunter, was born in February 2008, a month after Mr. Edwards suspended his run for the presidency. As the race between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama progressed, Mr. Edwards still held out hope for a position as attorney general or eventually as a Supreme Court justice.

      By that August, with the Democratic National Convention weeks away, he thought he could make the story go away by confessing to a brief affair but deny that the baby, at that point 6 months old, was his.

      So he asked Jennifer Palmieri, his former press secretary and a close friend of his wife, Elizabeth, to help arrange an interview on the ABC News program “Nightline” with the reporter Bob Woodruff, who has attended the trial nearly every day.

      Mr. Edwards was going to use a “thread the needle” strategy, said Ms. Palmieri, who is now a deputy director of communications for the White House.

      That is, he would confess to a brief affair and claim that it was over and that he and his wife had reconciled. He would deny both that the baby was his and that he arranged to pay to support Ms. Hunter.

      Ms. Palmieri advised him against it. She had come to believe the baby was his.

      “I told him I didn’t think he should do an interview if he was going to lie,” she told the court. “He didn’t need any more press attention at this point.”

      She knew his political career was essentially over, she testified Wednesday.“He was deluded for thinking otherwise,” she said.

      Still, he went ahead with the interview. It played for nearly 20 minutes on screens around the courtroom, including one on the defense table directly in front of him.

      Mr. Edwards watched a younger, happier-looking version of himself sitting forward in a chair in his Chapel Hill home, taking question after question.

      Was the affair over? “Oh, yes. It’s been over for a long time.” Is that your baby? “That is absolutely not true.”

      Two weeks earlier, he had been photographed at the Beverly Hills Hilton holding Quinn. But in the interview, he claimed no knowledge of who the baby was or where the photo had come from.

      The short affair happened when his wife’s cancer was in remission, he said, and was the result of narcissism and the conflicts that come from rising so high after growing up as a small-town boy with humble roots.

      Mr. Edwards, whose wife died in 2010, watched himself assert repeatedly that he never spent money supporting his former mistress and her child.

      “If the allegation is that somehow I participated in the payment of money, that is a lie,” he said. He said he would take a paternity test if asked.

      “One of the purposes of this interview, Bob, is to tell the truth,” he said.

      As the video ran, Mr. Edwards’s reaction was muted. He closed his eyes now and again, and sometimes touched his fingertips to his lips. When it was over and court was adjourned, his lawyer clapped him on the shoulder. Mr. Edwards laughed.

      He and his defense team appear confident that he will not be convicted, and that he will escape up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines.

      At the close of court on Wednesday, with the prosecution nearing the end of its case, Mr. Edwards turned to the head of his defense team, Abbe Lowell, and said, “This is their case?”

      On Friday, his lawyers will ask Judge Catherine C. Eagles to dismiss the charges, claiming the government has not presented a strong enough case against him to go to the jury.

      If she denies their motion, Mr. Edwards’s defense will begin Monday. Whether Mr. Edwards will testify in his own defense remains unclear.