To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (132403 ) 5/12/2012 1:20:17 PM From: Hope Praytochange 1 Recommendation Respond to of 224718 Edwards' corruption trial will continue, judge rules By: Associated Press , Times-Dispatch Staff | The Associated Press Published: May 12, 2012 Updated: May 12, 2012 - 12:00 AM » 0 Comments | Post a Comment RALEIGH, N.C. -- A federal judge refused to throw out campaign corruption charges against John Edwards on Friday, meaning the former presidential hopeful will have to present his case to a jury. Edwards' attorneys argued before U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Eagles that prosecutors failed to prove the 2008 candidate intentionally violated the law or that some of the alleged offenses actually occurred in the Middle District of North Carolina, the venue where he was indicted. After 21/2 hours of arguments from the defense and rebuttal from the prosecution, the judge ruled quickly from the bench that the government had met its basic burden under the law. "We will let the jury decide," Eagles said. Motions to dismiss are routine in criminal trials but rarely are granted. The decision means Edwards' attorneys will begin calling witnesses Monday. They said they had not determined which witnesses they will call first or whether Edwards will take the stand. Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six criminal counts related to campaign finance violations. He is accused of masterminding a scheme to use nearly $1 million in secret payments from two wealthy donors to help hide his pregnant mistress as he sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. He faces up to 30 years in prison if convicted on all counts. Edwards' lead attorney, Abbe Lowell, made an impassioned argument Friday, tearing down the government's evidence piece by piece, saying its case had numerous holes and that prosecutors were expecting the judge to serve as the "pothole filler." Lowell said that in 14 days of testimony, prosecutors failed to present direct evidence that Edwards intended to violate campaign finance laws when hiding his affair or lying about it to his wife, his campaign and the American people. Lots of cheating husbands lie, Lowell said. "They have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Edwards knew he was violating the law and did so with specific intent," Lowell told the judge. "No one is going to deny that Mr. Edwards lied and lied and lied. … But what did he lie about?"