Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (654938)	5/15/2012 2:55:53 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1585088

"Most Americans know that, even in the real world, when you bankrupt a company, you don't walk away with millions of dollars for yourself and others while workers are left holding the bag," said Stephanie Cutter, the deputy campaign manager for the Obama team, "That's simply wrong, especially if you're using those lessons and values learned from that experience as the central premise of your campaign for president. Romney didn't care about rewarding hard work and responsibility, he didn't care about everyone playing by the same set of rules; he cared about making money for him and his partners at all costs," she said.

To: bentway who wrote (654938)	5/15/2012 4:18:49 PM
From: joseffy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585088

LSD boy bentway won't show his face here in November when Hussein Obama takes down his whole party with him.

To: bentway who wrote (654938)	5/15/2012 4:28:19 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1585088

The NY Times Buries Unfavorable Obama Poll by Patrick Brennan [/url] May 15, 2012 nationalreview.com As Kate noted last night, the most recent New York Times/CBS poll on the presidential race has a number of notable findings: The vast majority of voters think his same-sex-marriage announcement was politically motivated, and he’s trailing Mitt Romney by two points among women. But you might have a hard time finding them featured prominently: Though the poll receives an A1 billing in the national edition, the story is below the fold on the 17th page of today’s New York edition. The Times’s previous four monthly polls this year have all received A1 billings in the New York edition, and usually an A17 article, too (on the second page of their inside “National” section). Surely the Times should give better placement to Americans’ opinion of our president, as their editorial board put it, “[taking] the moral high ground on what may be the great civil rights struggle of our time”? Further, one should never make too much of a single poll, but one finding was truly surprising and doesn’t receive any mention at all: Romney leads Obama among women, 46 to 44, erasing the somewhat substantial gender gap from April’s equivalent poll (Obama 49, Romney 43), and overall, leads the president 46 points to 43. In their 19-paragraph, 1,129-word analysis, the Times doesn’t deign to mention the female cross-tab number. As some commentators have pointed out, if Romney were actually to tie Barack Obama among women in the general election, he would almost definitely win. Even considering a substantial margin of error for this large subgroup, Romney is running extremely close among women, but this apparently isn’t at all worthy of mention. Despite the fact that this poll also finds that (by a 25 to 16 percent margin) his support of same-sex marriage makes voters less likely to vote for him, the piece is entitled, “New Poll Finds Voters Dubious of Obama’s Announcement on Same-Sex Marriage,” noting that voters overwhelmingly think that Obama’s decision was motivated by politics — but how newsworthy is that? Would any other conclusion be reasonable? Notably, also, in his “Playbook” e-mail’s summary of the poll this morning, Politico’s Mike Allen also essentially ignores all of the above findings, again emphasizing the assumed political motivations for Obama’s move, and not even providing the 25–16 number for support/oppose. The Obama campaign, meanwhile, realized the findings of the poll were significant enough to dispute the results, saying it used a “biased sample” (despite the fact that there were more Democrats than Republicans surveyed, and the poll’s registered, as opposed to likely, voter sample tends to be more favorable to Democrats).

To: bentway who wrote (654938)	5/15/2012 4:34:47 PM
From: joseffy	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585088

Obama’s Gamble on GM Worse than JPM’s Trading Flub Obama’s Gamble on GM Worse than JPM’s Trading Flub By: Mark Modica 05/15/2012 - 12:18 When JPM Chase reported that it had lost $2 billion recently on risky derivative trades, the predictable call came from the Obama Administration to increase regulation on banks. The hypocrisy of the politically motivated proclamations becomes evident when you compare the JPM trades to Treasury's continued gamble on its taxpayer funded stake in General Motors, which has suffered an approximate $5 billion loss in value over the past year.