SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (487273)5/16/2012 3:46:34 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793543
 
Old Ambrose is an optimist, isn't he? :>)

I want Obama to lose, but I don't want the world to go under!



To: FJB who wrote (487273)5/16/2012 7:33:12 PM
From: Bridge Player1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793543
 
I would go even further. sovereign central banks have the means to defeat any depression thrown at them by launching mass purchases of assets outside the banking system, working through the classic Hawtrey-Cassel quantity of money mechanism until nominal GDP is restored to its trend line.

Yep. Absolutely. Too much debt and credit got us into this problem, so the solution is obviously to launch "mass purchases of assets outside the banking system" until GDP is restored to its trend line.

Via the issue of more "funny money" and more debt. Pretty obvious.

The coming inflation ought to be a doozy. Shades of Germany circa 1920s and Zimbabwe.



To: FJB who wrote (487273)5/16/2012 7:33:35 PM
From: Bridge Player  Respond to of 793543
 
Dup.



To: FJB who wrote (487273)5/16/2012 10:10:38 PM
From: garrettjax  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793543
 
Deflation?!? Isn't that what happened in 1932?

-G