Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (26136)	5/16/2012 10:04:43 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

You weren't able to come up with anything that conservative Christians were ordering you to do except blather about the Boy Scouts. You mentioned a proposed amendment on school prayer, so I looked it up. It was a pet project of Robert Byrd who introduced it 7 times. All it would do is make it illegal to infringe on someone's right to pray and we shouldn't NEED an amendment for that. The FIRST AMENDMENT already forbids prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Frankly, the facts are that liberal justices have perverted the plain meaning of the Constitution so as to allow the censorship of religion and religious expression.

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (26136)	5/16/2012 10:25:37 AM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 69300

What's this Saudi-funded Islamic studies program at Harvard LAW about? Elena Kagan, The Mole, In Sheeps Clothing, Hiding in a Trojan Horse SwittersB @ 6:33 PM What would you say if you learned that a member of the highest court in the land has spent the last 30 years openly advocating for the destruction of the US Constitution and even went so far as to accept $20 million from Shariah Law proponents to accomplish her goal? That Supreme Court Justice is Elena Kagan. The year after Ronald Reagan entered the Oval Office with the goal of restoring America to greatness; Elena Kagan penned a telling and disturbing senior thesis titled “To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933.” In that body of work, Kagan lamented that “a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States”; and that,” no “radical party” had yet “attained the status of a major political force.” Kagan went on to sound a rally cry for “those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America.” Apparently, this was no mere college dalliance, as the Elena Kagan has spent the rest of her career working to remove the underpinnings of freedom and destroy the American Constitution from within. And Kagan’s grand plan has worked very well indeed. After graduate school Kagan went on to become Dean of Harvard Law, where she removed Constitutional Law classes from the curriculum, and replaced those necessary and time honored classes with required studies of international law. And in what appears to be a game of using a mutual enemy’s resources to accomplish ones’ true objective, Kagan also accepted a $20 million grant from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal – a noted Shariah Law proponent – to implement an “Islamic Studies” program. Lest we think Kagan’s intentions are ancient history, take a look at her line of questioning when hearing the ObamaCare case last month. Rather than question the thinly veiled socialist Trojan horse as an affront to our Constitution, Kagan seemed almost willing to defend ObamaCare and salvage the master plan to fundamentally change America into a new Euro-socialist model. By definition, our Supreme Court is charged with upholding, defending and preserving the United States Constitution. The Judges on the Supreme Court are meant to protect our freedom, not destroy it. By: Rocky Mountain Black Tea Party zipline.wordpress.com

To: Cautious_Optimist who wrote (26136)	5/16/2012 10:54:20 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 69300

It appears there is even more affirmative action, equal opportunity mocking to be done regarding Elizabeth Warren and the Lefties who enable her. Politico reports that a Fordham piece called her “Harvard’s first woman of color.” No, for reals. Diversity! Or something. Elizabeth Warren has pushed back hard on questions about a Harvard Crimson piece in 1996 that described her as Native American, saying she had no idea the school where she taught law was billing her that way and saying it never came up during her hiring a year earlier, which others have backed up. But a 1997 Fordham Law Review piece described her as Harvard Law School’s “first woman of color,” based, according to the notes at the bottom of the story, on a “telephone interview with Michael Chmura, News Director, Harvard Law (Aug. 6, 1996).” Rut-roh! The internet never forgets, Sacaja-whiner! And Twitter never passes up an opportunity for well-deserved mocking.