To: TideGlider who wrote (10523 ) 11/25/1997 5:11:00 PM From: Starlight Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
Bruce - First of all - I am a Cymer investor. Yes, I really do own the stock! In the past few weeks, I've read through thousands of posts while Cymer continued its fall. I read over and over how it was all because of Cymer pulling out of an investor's conference at the last minute, poor PR, etc., etc., etc. It's hard to recall seeing many posts that said anything about competition (other than from that "bulldozer company" - they make really big bulldozers, by the way. I saw one recently.). Everyone here thinks I'm just here to promote another company -- that I have an "adgenda". My adgenda is to try to make people look at what is going on in the industry Cymer is involved in. Okay -- let's say X-ray won't be profitable for the companies involved for 4-5 years. THAT'S NOT THE POINT!! The point is that as soon as a new technology (such as XRL) is announced, it creates anticipation in potential customers. A customer thinking of building a new fab might just want to wait a while to see what develops with that technology. With XRL there is the benefit of being able to scale down in feature size as the need warrants it -- without having to invest in all new equipment. So who wins here and who loses? Cymer might lose a "potential customer" because they are waiting for XRL which will give them more far-reaching utility from the equipment. All of you are saying you can't make money investing in XRL equipment companies because they will take years to become profitable. Maybe so, but in the meantime if customers DO buy XRL, they AREN'T going to buy as much DUV. I'm really tired of trying to get this point across, as it seems as though I've failed in doing so, so far. I hope everyone has a nice Thanksgiving and we can end this discussion for now. Betty