Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Media Stocks--Newspaper, TV, Radio, etc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseffy who wrote (447)	5/18/2012 3:00:49 PM
From: MJ	1 Recommendation Read Replies (8) \| Respond to of 826

MAY 18TH, 2012 - mj THANKS YOU FOR POSTING JOHN NOLTE'S ARTICLE POINTING OUT THE DOUBLE STANDARD OF THE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE WITH THE RECENT HIT PIECE ON ROMNEY THE APPARENT CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF USA. In addition to ignoring Obama's background as a drug user in Hawaii while at the expensive private school Punahou the writer of the WASHINGTON POST article and the editor who approved the hit piece ignored the fact that Obama was a student at the only private Preparatory School in Honolulu, Hawaii. Only the wealthy in Hawaii could afford to send their children to Punahou. Obama had all of the benefits of wealth yet the WAPO and Obama tear down Americans who have become wealthy through their generations of hard work such as Candidate Romney's family did. HIT PIECES BY WAPO The coordination of hit pieces has been going on for decades by WAPO. That does not excuse their lies. The 1980's are full of hit pieces by WAPO on Republican Candidates for the Virginia General Assembly. I don't have time to write about those incidents-------some who were the targets are dead now. Their campaigns were destroyed by the hit pieces. That will not happen to Romney, the apparent nominee, the WAPO is no longer believable. They are like an annoying gnat. The good news is that the WAPO no longer wields the media power they did during Nixon's times or during Reagan's time. The word has gotten out that there are alternative news sources to the WAPO. Those sources work to not inflame with insinuation such as reported in the article you posted. How very naive of the WAPO writer to fuel such nonsense digging into an era when boys were boys and men were real men and making untrue insinuations. In reference to breitbart.com credit to greatplainsguy