SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Renren -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zax who wrote (280)5/18/2012 3:18:20 PM
From: Glenn Petersen3 Recommendations  Respond to of 310
 
It's going to be a lot worse if FB breaks $38, though I don't think that the underwriters will let that happen. Between the Facebook IPO disappointment and what is going on in Europe, we could be looking at a real ugly market next week.



To: zax who wrote (280)5/19/2012 1:55:59 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 310
 
This may explain why RENN was hit particularly hard yesterday:

Medvedev Nukes Russia’s Stock Market

Walter Russell Mead
May 19, 2012

It was just a short aside in a speech; the junior member of Russia’s rotating leadership team was talking about how conflicts like the one in Syria could have broader implications for world politics and pointed out that great powers could get involved in unpredictable ways:

“At some moment, such actions, which undermine sovereignty, can end with a full-fledged regional war, or even, and I don’t want to scare anybody, the use of nuclear weapons.”


(From the New York Times.)

It was intended as a veiled threat to the United States — more as an expression of Russia’s strong displeasure with the US approach to Syria than as an actual announcement that Russia would consider a nuclear strike if the US intervenes in Damascus.

But it was enough to cause the fragile Russian stock market to fall 3.5 percent, wiping, the Times estimates, $24 billion from the values of Russia’s listed companies.

The market fall was not, I think, caused by investors wondering what nuclear war would do to Gazprom’s earnings. It was due to their perception that a Russian government given to random and pointless saber-rattling was not going to move forcefully on economic reforms and transparency issues, and that the long term interests of the country are going to be sacrificed for short term demagoguery. Instead of a moderate, responsible and focused leadership aimed at reforming and restructuring an increasingly ramshackle economic structure, Putinocracy 3.0 would be, if anything, a little worse than the 2.0 model when Medvedev was the president and Putin the prime minister. More, it suggested that the prime minister is on a short leash; Medvedev has been presented as a modern minded reformer. If he is mouthing stale and unconvincing Cold War threats, it looks as if he has even less autonomy than markets feared.

blogs.the-american-interest.com