SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-HARD & SOFTWARE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (118)11/26/1997 12:07:00 PM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Respond to of 163
 
Thanks Derek B and Sean W. Smith for all of the good advice about how to set up an Ethernet network for home use. My goal is to find a good way to synchronise the files on a laptop and a desktop PC. Your approach will be a faster than using the serial ports for transferring data between the two PCs.



To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (118)12/3/1997 11:53:00 AM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 163
 
Most likely a coincidence but I see the December 16, 1997 edition of PC Magazine has a good article on small networks. The article is titled "The ABC's of Windows 95 Networks". The article cleared up a couple of points that wern't mention in the previous discussion. In particular the two different types of networks, client/server and peer to peer. A Client/server network requires a network operating system, for example Novell's Netware or Windows NT Server. Whereas the type you recommended, a peer to peer does not require a network operating system. Windows 95 has support built into it for a peer to peer network. The article mentioned one major advantage a small ethernet network has over a direct connection is that an ethernet network permits two way communications whereas a direct connection only permits one way conmmunication. I am convinced ethernet is the way to go.

I recommended this article to any one planning on implementing a small network.