SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (487992)5/21/2012 2:01:01 PM
From: sm1th4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794009
 
Taxes are bad, but it's the spending that's killing us.



Agreed, no level of taxation could support the current spending.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (487992)5/21/2012 2:02:03 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794009
 
If the deal was $100 billion spending cut in year one (meaning if this year the Federal Government spent $x next year they will spend $x-$100 billion, not just a 10 year decrase in the rate of increase) in return for $10 billion in tax increase in year 2, I'd take that deal in a heart beat.

I'm sure the democrats would never go for it but call their bluff for crying out loud. Make them look like the party no.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News