SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: give_me_a_break who wrote (134019)5/21/2012 5:01:12 PM
From: Cogito1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213176
 
Confusing, because the headlines on Yahoo: "Kodak has nothing on Apple" suggests the exact opposite ?
The ruling was mixed at best for Kodak. Essentially, the court is saying that Apple has infringed an invalid patent. If the patent is ruled invalid, Kodak doesn't end up with anything.



To: give_me_a_break who wrote (134019)5/21/2012 5:20:01 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213176
 
Who understands patent law? I don't think the patent at tourneys even have a clue.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News