SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (488200)5/22/2012 9:56:13 PM
From: Farmboy3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793983
 
Read your post with interest, but honestly, am truly lost about something.

you stated:

The radicals in the Tea Party gave us Harry Reid for two more years - not to mention the lunatic rants of Rush. Common sense needs a seat at the Republican table.

Then you posted:

There is no Ronald Reagan in 2012. We need to rally to our colors and hope Mitt has the stones to call Obama a liar to his face.
I need some help determining how Mitt calling Obama a liar to his face, would not be generally akin to what something those to whom you refer as "radicals of the Tea Party" would do.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (488200)5/23/2012 9:34:11 AM
From: Brumar894 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793983
 
hope Mitt has the stones to call Obama a liar to his face.


Romney is going to win unless he blows it. I'm concerned about what happens after the guy who designed Obamacare, got cap and trade adopted, was pro-gun control, saw the Catholic church leave the adoption arrangement business in his state, disowned Reagan, called himself a Progressive, is in office.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News