Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (488209)	5/22/2012 10:19:32 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793986

here's what you don't get. Good candidates didn't want to run against established RINO republicans. They didn't know how strong the tea party was. so they didn't want to waste time and monies against established elitist repuibs. now that they saw how good week candidates like Angle and O'Donnell did more and more strong tea party guys will run. It will just take time

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (488209)	5/22/2012 10:30:26 PM
From: Farmboy	2 Recommendations Respond to of 793986

Agree, and I have accepted that Mitt is the candidate and needs our support. I just thought Mitt calling Obama a liar to his face would be pretty 'radical' and much like something those 'radical tea party' folks you referenced, would do. Personally, there are a lot of other things as well, I would like to see Mitt confront Obama about, face to face, on national TV, and call him whatever the moment dictates. It's hard to get too 'radical' in defense of our nation, as I see it.