Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (26364)	5/23/2012 3:40:08 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 69300

It's not the case that Jesus didn't mention a future period when the gospel would be preached to all men - see Matthew 24:14 or John 10:16. There is another problem with your viewpoint ... if it's true, how did the movement change so quickly? If the risen Jesus gave new instructions after the resurrection ... that would be a good explanation.

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (26364)	5/24/2012 3:47:08 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Respond to of 69300

There has/is always the question of 'who is a jew.' The scholars get all particular about it but in practicality most people just figure a common link in history is 'nuf said. Ruth, that destitute moabite woman (non-Jew) would be grandma of King David. Now there is a Jew who made quite a splash in the puddle of his day, and who would be followed in lineage by Jesus. So, what's the big deal if Jesus winks at non-Jews or not? Ruth was so cool, she got her own book in the OT.