SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Media Stocks--Newspaper, TV, Radio, etc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MJ who wrote (457)5/25/2012 9:55:05 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 826
 
LIBERALS – LOVE THY ENEMY, HATE THY COUNTRYMEN!

May 25, 2012 | | Posted by: AWD


The poison of political correctness has seeped deep into the fabric of liberal America. Gone are the days when common sense ruled. When good was good and bad was bad. The days when America was seen as a force for good. When we could want to kill our enemies. When the enemies weren’t Americans! Yes, liberal America is a disease that corrupts logic and reason and replaces it with nonsensical ideologies designed to destroy America.

Case in point. Look at the three recent Muslim terrorist events on US soil. In each case, liberals have refused to associate the attempted attacks on radical Islam when it is crystal clear to anyone with intellectual honesty that radical Islam was the direct catalyst. To avoid admitting the obvious, liberals will invent diseases or alibis for Muslim terrorists. In the case of the Ft. Hood Muslim psychiatrist who went on a hate-filled shooting rampage, liberals said he did so because he listened to returning soldiers dealing with post stress disorder symptoms and the symptoms rubbed off on him. So the symptoms affecting the soldiers transferred to the doctor? Good one! But not nearly as good as the Time Square bomber. Instead of admitting the attempted bomber was a Muslim radical who wanted to kill Americans, they attributed his actions to the recent foreclosure on his home. Thousands have experienced home foreclosure in the past several years throughout America but have not opted to blow up innocents in New York. Of course, they didn’t spend five months in Pakistan training with Muslim radicals in bomb building!

Liberals, however, have no hesitation to condemn their fellow Americans who don’t subscribe to their brand of intellectual lunacy. When asked by Katie Couric who he suspected might be guilty of the Times Square attempted bombing, RINO Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he suspected “a homegrown suspect who might be angry about health care reform.” Of course, that translates into a tea party patriot! Liberal newscasters even said they wished the culprit was a tea partier!

Liberals have ridiculed and accused the Tea Party movement from its inception. It’s crime? Calling on our federal government to spend less money than it receives!

Even the President refers to the Tea Party as “teabaggers” which is a sexual slang term.

But he, nor his administration, will call Muslim terrorists Muslim terrorists! Here’s a prime example of the lunacy of this administration and the poison of political correct liberalism:

[iframe height=315 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HOQt_mP6Pgg" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen][/iframe]

Listen to that stumbling fool try to avoid a yes/no answer! He had no problem criticizing the Arizona immigration law as racist but had not taken the time to read it. In the liberal’s world, America is bad and conservative America is worse!

The mainstream media protects liberal idiots from true scrutiny because they both share the same radical, anti-American agenda. Recently, libtard actor Tom Hanks said our soldiers in WW II were racist and only attacked Japanese soldiers because they looked different from Americans! Guess he forgot about that little thing called Pearl Harbor.

Liberals love their enemies and hate us. Somewhere down the road, America lost it’s edge. It stopped teaching American exceptionalism and started teaching America was a problem to overcome. Liberals started believing traditional American values like patriotism, hard work, responsibility, capitalism and free markets were passe and outdated. Liberal elites ridicule the very principles that made America wealthy and strong.

The Tea Party movement is the last hope for America. If the Tea Party fails, the great American experiment fails. The country that created more wealth and did more good than all other countries combined will become another tired, corrupt socialist has-been like western Europe. If that occurs, we will have let our children down and sentenced them to a life of servitude to corrupt communist masters. I just cannot let that happen. Can you?

Here’s what 50 years of cradle-to-grave welfare, socialist teachers unions and the propaganda media have created. Lovely, isn’t it?

http://angrywhitedude.com/2012/05/liberals-love-thy-enemy-hate-thy-countrymen-2/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

credit to brumar



To: MJ who wrote (457)5/25/2012 10:08:22 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 826
 
The Last Days of the Media

Wednesday, May 23, 2012
sultanknish.blogspot.com


The magazine business isn't what it used to be. In the last ten years, Newsweek lost 2.5 million readers, and its newsstand sales are hardly worth mentioning. A full-page ad in it costs less than the price of a luxury car. Sold for a buck to the husband of an influential Congresswoman, merged with an internet site, it survives only by building issues around provocative essays and covers.



If you want to understand why Newsweek put a badly photoshopped picture of Obama with a gay halo on its cover or features Romney doing a number from The Book of Mormon, you need only look at those numbers. Fifteen years ago desperate tactics like that were for alt weeklies like The Village Voice, but Time and Newsweek are the new Village Voice. Or the new Salon.

There is no news business anymore, just media trolls looking for a traffic handout, feeding off manufactured controversies that they create and then report on. Magazines and sites struggling to stay alive while preaching to a narrow audience which likes essays by leftist cranks and mocking pictures of conservatives. And they're not alone; any magazine that still covers politics, covers it in the same exact way.

There are house-style differences between the New Yorker, which still features its trademark cartoons, and Vanity Fair and Esquire, and Time and Newsweek, but they are all basically the same. The same essays repeating the same views for the same audience; all of them fighting for that small slice of urban yuppie audience which DVR's Mad Men, has Michael Chabon novels on the shelf that it hasn't read yet and is forty percent gay.

The real 1 percent is right there. That small elitist fragment of America which writes books for itself, makes TV shows for itself and writes outraged articles for itself about a tiny 1 percent elite that runs everything. It has its own books, its own TV shows, its own music, its own stores, its own stations, its own brands and now it has most of the magazines to itself. It's a claustrophobic village raising its own inner child with inane repetitions of its narrow-minded views.

If I'm reading through a long mocking piece on Midwestern Republican primary voters who support Michele Bachmann, a sensitive piece on gay teenagers being bullied in school or an essay by a Muslim columnist on American Islamophobia, how can I tell which magazine I'm reading? Easy, is it the one with a gay Obama on the cover or the one with a woman breastfeeding a three-year-old?

The story is no longer the story. Now the cover is the story with magazines reporting on their own covers, which become the story. And the story? Who cares about the story really. You can know everything about the story by glancing at the cover. And then you don't have to buy it anymore, which explains why newsstand sales aren't doing too well.

Magazines like to tell advertisers that every single subscription sale actually means five or six readers across a family. That's wishful thinking. Families with five or six members are not buying Time or Newsweek these days. They might be subscribing to Popular Mechanics or Ebony, but the Newsweek subscriber is lucky if he has two people in the house, at most three, and one of them is probably a cat.



Don't weep for Newsweek though. It's a brand and brands never die. They just get dumbed down and sold and resold. Five years from now Newsweek may be an airline magazine or just an internet portal tracking Twitter news trends, but it will be around in one form or another. For now there's Newsweek Polska with a six figure circulation, Newsweek Korea with 40,000 readers and Newsweek Pakistan with 15,000 readers. Perhaps one day Newsweek will be remembered as a Pakistani news mag that got its start in the States.

The brands may have a future, but the content doesn't. There are only so many provocative essayists around and only so many people willing to buy badly photoshopped covers featuring the controversy of the week. The friction of the controversy makes dull people seem interesting and stupid people seem smart. It makes the kind of people who moved to New York to be able to see Will Ferrell make fun of Bush on Broadway feel that they're relevant, but there aren't enough of them to support a magazine with international news bureaus and all the trappings of a serious news organization.

There's barely enough money in that market to cover the expenses of Salon, Slate and The Nation, reliably lefty publications which cravenly feed their audiences its prejudices back in small doses. Time and Newsweek muscling into that same turf, not to mention every other site and magazine following that same business model, is a bit much.

Advertisers only need to reach that same audience so many times. There's money in selling Bose stereos, Cancun vacations and AMC shows to them, but you can only sell it to them so many times. When every magazine is elitist and when the elite is narrow and inbred, there are suddenly too many llamas in a single paddock.

The biggest problem for the media is that no one is paying attention anymore. The iPad and Kindle haven't meant salvation for the magazine business, because any media device fragments focus. It's hard to engage readers when they're not engaged with any one thing, when they're reading six sites and glancing through your latest Fareed Zakaria or Andrew Sullivan screed just to be able to tell their friends that they read it.

In a diminishing marketplace every outlet boasts of having the smartest and most influential readers. The truth is that no one has those readers anymore. The media makes its own influence because it is playing on an empty stage. It isn't influencing anyone, it's repeating back to its readers what they already believe because they already believe it. If they didn't already believe it, it wouldn't tell it to them.

The media knows that they have many options and that they're barely paying attention, so it capers like a court jester to try and capture their attention with another showstopping attack on Republicans. But even as it trots out Andrew Sullivan or Tina Fey or any of the other players in the vanishing line between entertainment and journalism, it knows that the attention is fleeting. Today its gay Obama cover makes the headlines, but what will it do next week?

An inbred elite is dull and in constant need of sensation. It has a brief attention span because it is always bored with itself. It feeds off a diet of constant mockery to reassure itself of its own fragile superiority. It wants the appearance of ideas, without the hard work of digesting them. Most of all, it wants the legitimization of its own right to rule. The theme of every elite is its own superiority, and the one we are saddled with is no different. Its message is that it has lifted up our society from a dark time of repression to a new era of enlightenment and that only it can lead us into the light.

The media is an echo chamber for people who work in the media. Its greatest reach is internal, within the complex of people who live or work in a few major cities within the publishing and broadcasting industries. Beyond them is a great void of purple mountains that they occasionally report on but have lost contact with.

America is a foreign country to them. More so than Indonesia or Pakistan. And the 1 percent that they still speak to feels much the same way. A foreign colony on American shores that disdains the natives with their queer morals and prejudices, and fears what might happen if they should rise up against their rightful rulers. That leaves the rulers with little choice but to redouble the propaganda barrage defending their right to rule. And that means another Newsweek cover coming up.

Newsweek might as well become a full-time Pakistani magazine because it isn't an American magazine anymore. It's the David Remnick New Yorker with all the class of the Tina Brown New Yorker. Its only signature feature is the transcontinental sneer and that's the signature feature of the entire media class, which knows more about Indonesia than it does about Indiana, and believes that the problem with America is all the Americans.



But even that is a sham because not only do they know nothing about Indiana, but they also know very little about Indonesia. The pretense at being globe trotting journalists that fills the pages of magazines and newspapers is a sham. Theirs is not the age of the classic correspondents who could cross a war zone and telegraph in a report. It's the age of media trolls who put a picture of a nuclear-armed North Korean leader under the headline, "Lil Kim". The Muslim Brotherhood can twirl them around its fingers because they're fools who can spend years in a country without learning anything more about it than the common knowledge at the expat bar.

The only function of the media is to spin talking points into something more glamorous. It always knows what the story should be, the only thing to do is dress it up and take it out for a night on the town. But no one reads it or pays attention to it anymore because it has nothing to say. The antics of Time or Newsweek are signs of desperation from media brats who know that the only way to hang on to their vanishing audience is by clowning around for them.

They can't engage the audience, no matter what they promise advertisers, because they have no intellectual or journalistic capital with which to engage them. All they can do is tell their audience what it already believes in an entertaining way. That is the traditional function of a court jester and it is the new function of the media, which may style itself as a "Protector of Democracy", but is in reality just the tyrant's capering fool in the rainbow halo.





7 comments Permalink



You might also like:



Friday Afternoon Roundup - Remembering




Friday Afternoon Roundup - Bombthrowers and Condolences




National Survival for America and Israel in the Age of ...




Friday Afternoon Roundup - The Shape of Things to Come




Friday Afternoon Roundup - Bread and Racial Circuses


LinkWithin



Email Post (Backlinks) Digg This!Save to del.icio.usStumble It!Share on FacebookBlog ThisEmail thisEmail the authorTwit This!Submit to Reddit




To: MJ who wrote (457)5/27/2012 10:04:19 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 826
 
The Self-Destruction of the Mainstream Media

By Steve McCann January 23, 2012
americanthinker.com

For the past forty years the mainstream media has become increasingly liberal and more overt in promoting the policies of the Democratic Party. This evolutionary process reached its zenith in 2008 when the media were instrumental in Barack Obama being elected President. Many journalists dropped any pretense of objectivity and became not only cheerleaders but active de facto members of the campaign.

What has their loyalty and prostration achieved for the journalism community? During the past two decades no other sector of the economy has experienced such overwhelming financial and employment devastation.

Yet the vast majority of the media do not understand why theirs is a declining and failing business model. They are still in denial and cannot accept the reality of the marketplace, as their actions have prompted the American public to lose all confidence in their objectivity and integrity.

The 2012 election season has begun and this same media finds itself in the position of having to defend and reinforce the man they chose to sleep with. They have willingly opted to do exactly that. The mainstream media is systematically pulling out all the stops to destroy any and all viable Republican challengers in an undeclared but understood alliance with the Obama re-election machine.

Rather than objectively analyze the folly of the Obama class warfare strategy and its potential to undermine and destroy societal cohesion, the mainstream media has trumpeted and encouraged this divisive and dangerous strategy. The Occupy Wall Street movement, conceived by Friends of Obama and encouraged by the White House, as well as blessed by many in the media, was intended to further reinforce the war against the rich and redirect the anger and blame for all of America's woes away from the statist policies of the Obama regime. Mitt Romney, who since last summer has been the presumptive opponent to oppose Obama, is in the process of being cast as the capitalist villain in this stage production.

Herman Cain was destroyed by unproven and salacious allegations of sexual harassment. Michele Bachmann was portrayed as wild-eyed and unstable religious fanatic, and Rick Perry was painted as an ignorant, incoherent and unreliable cowboy from Texas. Characterizations that would never be applied to any Democratic candidate.

When it comes to Newt Gingrich there is no ethical barrier too high for the media to tear down in an attempt to marginalize him. Now the specter of an acknowledged bitter ex-wife being given access to a national stage two days before a crucial primary vote in order to vent her side of an emotional and vitriolic divorce saga is considered acceptable, as well as any innuendo or accusation created out of whole cloth. A scenario that would never be contemplated were Newt a liberal Democrat.

What has this loyalty to progressive group-think and the Democratic Party wrought for the members of this once-proud profession? The landscape of the once mighty journalism community is one of utter devastation.

Since 2001 American newsrooms have lost more than 25 per cent of their full time journalists resulting in a level of employment not seen since the mid-1970's. Just since 2007 over 14,000 have lost their jobs.

Among other examples of this decline and fall are:

The New York Times Company, often considered the bellwether of the national media, has reduced its labor force by 47% (6,600 jobs) since 2000. The average daily circulation for the Times has dropped by over 21% (234,000 readers) during the same period. The Company has been liquidating as many assets as possible in order to stay afloat; they now have few viable assets left to sell and will soon be facing bankruptcy

The Washington Post, the other most influential newspaper in the country, has seen its average daily circulation drop by 33% (263,000 readers) since 2000. More devastating has been the plummet in print advertising revenue which has dropped by over 60% since 2000. They too have made major reductions in their labor force.

Among the largest chains of newspapers in the country, the McClatchy Company has experienced a similar downturn. Since acquiring the Knight-Ridder chain in 2006, the Company has seen its average daily circulation decline from 2.84 million readers to 2.05 (a drop of 28% in only four years). Many of the individual papers within the group have resorted to massive layoffs and selling assets as not only circulation but ad revenue has dropped precipitously.

The Gannet family of newspapers (the largest in the country) has lost over 2 million in paid circulation since 2000 (28%) while their ad revenue has dropped by 48%.

Since 2000 total U.S. newspaper circulation has fallen by nearly 11 million readers with no end to this freefall in sight.

The traditional news magazines (Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report) have experienced even more devastating results since 2000. Their readership has declined by over 3.6 million (40%). Advertising revenue has dropped by nearly 70%. A clear indicator of the demise of this media sector is the sale of Newsweek by the Washington Post Company for $1.00.

The three network evening news broadcasts have suffered a similar fate. Since 1991 they have lost 12.6 million viewers ( 34%).

In an attempt to offset the drastic decline in their core businesses all the various media companies have made a late foray into the internet; however the revenue generated by that sector does not begin to make up for the ongoing financial hemorrhaging.

The mainstream media is first and foremost a business. Like any business it must generate revenue, pay its bills and make a profit for its shareholders. To produce income it must attract customers (advertisers and subscribers) to buy its product (the news as well as viewers or readers). Based on the results over the past ten years it is obvious that the product the mainstream media is promoting is not selling.

Rather than understanding the basics of the free market and how capitalism has enabled many of the old guard in the mainstream media to live extremely comfortable lives, the most important and fashionable matter for the vast majority of the journalism community has been to be part of the in-crowd, which requires little independence of thought or even the ability to generate an original thought.

Thus many in the media are still caught up in the old paradigm of good versus evil wherein conservatives are evil and liberals are good. Despite the fact that many have experienced or know of others in their profession with first-hand knowledge of layoffs, salary reductions and virtually no job prospects, they never seem to ask why or what will the future be for their chosen profession much less the country as a whole.

A cursory examination of history reveals the catastrophic failure of nations composed of a massive central government siphoning off the wealth of the people in order to reward those the governing regime deems to be acceptable. The media is never among the chosen; in fact it is often the first profession to be marginalized.

Yet like so many on the Left, a majority of the members of the mainstream media are incapable of recognizing their error in blindly supporting the liberal/socialist agenda over the years. Regardless of the evidence at hand, either historic or contemporary, their egos and narcissism so dominate their psyche that admitting a mistake is tantamount to the apocalypse. Thus they appear willing to sacrifice their own future and standard of living by actively campaigning for Obama's re-election rather than honestly report on the lies and machinations of this regime and their devastating impact on future generations. The only outcome the media has guaranteed is the continued decline and degradation of their once noble profession.



Read more: americanthinker.com



To: MJ who wrote (457)5/28/2012 10:51:09 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 826
 
VFW demands apology after host says he's 'uncomfortable' calling fallen soldiers heroes

May 28, 2012
foxnews.com


A top veterans group called Monday for an "immediate and unequivocal apology" after an MSNBC host said on the eve of Memorial Day that it makes him "uncomfortable" to describe fallen soldiers as heroes.

Chris Hayes made the comment while kicking off a panel discussion Sunday on his show, "Up With Chris Hayes."

He noted it's "very difficult to talk about the war dead and the fallen without invoking valor, without invoking the words 'heroes.'"

Hayes tried to explain why that makes him uneasy: "I feel ... uncomfortable about the word hero because it seems to me that it is so rhetorically proximate to justifications for more war."

Veterans of Foreign Wars, in addition to a throng of conservative bloggers and groups, slammed Hayes for being so conflicted about the term.

"Chris Hayes' recent remarks on MSNBC regarding our fallen service members are reprehensible and disgusting," VFW National Commander Richard DeNoyer said in a statement to FoxNews.com. "His words reflect his obvious disregard for the service and sacrifice of the men and women who have paid the ultimate price while defending our nation. His insipid statement is particularly callous because it comes at a time when our entire nation pauses to reflect and honor the memory of our nations' fallen heroes."

He continued: "It is especially devastating to the many broken-hearted children, spouses and parents, left behind to grieve for a loved one. Such an ignorant and uncaring and blatant disregard for people's deep feelings are indefensible, and that is why the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States demand that Mr. Hayes and MSNBC provides an immediate and unequivocal apology."

On the show Sunday, Hayes couched his remarks and acknowledged his concerns might not be justified.

"I don't want to obviously desecrate or disrespect memory of anyone that's fallen, and obviously there are individual circumstances in which there is genuine, tremendous heroism -- of you know, hail of gunfire, rescuing fellow soldiers and things like that. But it seems to me that we marshal this word in a way that is problematic," he said. "But maybe I'm wrong about that."

Hayes later tweeted in defense of the discussion, linking to another segment in which he talked about how many Americans do not feel connected to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- with a relatively tiny percentage of the country actually fighting those wars.

"Sure this won't stop the twitter hate, but ask people to watch this and see if we were being insufficiently respectful," he tweeted.


Read more: foxnews.com