SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Turnarund Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: batman10023 who wrote (1458)5/25/2012 9:14:35 AM
From: KirbyJF1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1876
 
Hi Battie- Are you saying that any time a person comments on a stock - That is Pumping? I disagree with that view. I enjoy having a spirited discussion on stocks, but I also understand there is reasons that people have different views & that is fine. If you a negative view on a business plan,management,industry or any other reason, one probably would short the stock. If you have a counter vailing view one possibly would Buy the stock. What I don't understand is when someone continues to BASH a stock & has no interest in a security. ((That is a HIDDEN AGENDA)) Another thing is when a person is building a position in a particular stock, I will sell in days that I feel a stock has spiked & take a profit to help holding costs & then as it drops back down I will buy back my position that I sold. ((That doesn't mean I don't like the company for the Long Term)) Look at TA as the Bollinger bands are helpful. This is my view & if someone doesn't want to read my views, Ignore is an option. Really like Novation ((NOVC)) here as management is making a silk purse out of a pigs ear. ((Old saying))

Kirby



To: batman10023 who wrote (1458)5/25/2012 10:38:33 AM
From: Covenant  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1876
 
NWLI sure turned out to be a stinker, hitting a new low yesterday. It is one of my buy candidates. What do you think a good bid would be, 30% of tangible book conservatively stated?