Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia Corp. (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric L who wrote (7403)	5/26/2012 1:27:00 AM
From: zax	Respond to of 9255

Eric, >> Please take further castigation of Elop to the 'Tankwatch' board ... I take offense. No dumping. -- Zax

To: Eric L who wrote (7403)	5/26/2012 5:21:24 AM
From: sylvester80	1 Recommendation Respond to of 9255

I would like to think that the Nokia board is different than the Apple board, from allowing the questioning and criticism of Nokia's leadership actions. After all, any posts pale in comparison to the repetitive glowing and positive Nokia posts, even in the face of nokia's poor results and new IDC numbers. So until Elop shows different results from the loss of market share, continued monetary losses and burning of cash, allow me to have the opinion that he made the wrong choice. WinPhone volumes and share are on the increase, contrary to what you have repeatedly stated. I'm not the one stating that. IDC is stating that. If you have different numbers I sure would like to see them. blogs.computerworld.com

To: Eric L who wrote (7403)	5/26/2012 12:44:07 PM
From: pcstel	2 Recommendations Respond to of 9255

Syl, Your flogging that horse to death in highly repetitive fashion. Please tighten it up in posts to this board. A few less posts, each with more substance would be great. Quality over quantity. TIA sylvester80 made 9 posts in the previous 24 hour period. zax made 8 posts in the same previous 24 hour period. sylvester80 post were more negative than zax's. "The Moderator" only "warned" the SI member "sylvester80" posting the "more negative posts", to post "a few less posts, with more substance... Quality of quantity", yet sylvester80 only posted 1 more post in the 24 hour period than zax?" And so it goes, PCSTEL