Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (2502)	11/25/1997 7:06:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6843

Petz , I agree with your rules... Notice I have not been responding to those characters . There is a better way to clutter up their thread in answering their posts :- click on their post , when their latest post is on screen click on their name in the header . You will the receive their profile with their recent posts . click on a post on the Intel thread then respond to it. , Brian

To: Petz who wrote (2502)	11/25/1997 7:13:00 PM
From: StockMan	Respond to of 6843

P, Re -- cra.ola.. Rule No 0. Do not post cra.ola on this or any thread.!! Your post was pure cra.ola. Stockman

To: Petz who wrote (2502)	11/25/1997 9:14:00 PM
From: Yousef	Respond to of 6843

John, Re: "May I suggest the following rules ..." It would help if you tried to post accurate information and reasonable analysis ... you have been "way off the mark" too many times in the past to have much credibility. Please see the following post: exchange2000.com John, Re: "Giving it a bad name." Now let's see ... your "inaccurate" Q2/Q3 predictions, poor IC process understanding, "wrong" information on poor yield analysis ... these examples are how AMD is supposed to be represented ... come to think of it ... Are you Jerry Sanders, by any chance ??!! John, please stick to your area of expertise ... this will help in future discussions. You might want to follow Brian's example ... just don't submit any technical posts!! Make It So, Yousef

To: Petz who wrote (2502)	11/25/1997 9:48:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

Mr Petz, I don't think the other AMD investors are so stupid as to take orders from you, or anyone else as to who they should correspond with. You are the one who has an astonishingly bad record when it comes to accuracy. I am not saying you have lied, I don't think that is the case. You have just carelessly posted false information time and time again and I think it is a service to provide AMD investors with clarification when you post clearly false information. Your track record is terrible and AMD investors deserve better than just your single carelessly researched view. They deserve other perspectives to allow them to make sound investment decisions. This forum is intended for investors, not zelots. EP

To: Petz who wrote (2502)	11/26/1997
From: Time Traveler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

Petz, Your two rules: 1. Very juvenile, just like high school. 2. Very infantile, just like kindergarten. What is your mental age? Could I represent it with my ten fingers? Now, where is that super-mature twenty year old? He seems to have more maturity physically than yours mentally. By the way, nobody would care if you clog up the Intel thread. John.