Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (73062)	5/29/2012 12:23:59 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

LOL!!! That lunatic jlallen has replaced all the other nut cases put together, even another nut case knows he's a liar... LOL!!! Too funny!!! GZ

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (73062)	5/29/2012 12:52:25 PM
From: one_less	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

Yikes...[too] The poster known as SeachRE has been tagged on SI for decades as a perverted sociopath, who only hangs on that somewhat dead thread, where he has pretty much designated it as his SI home ... some have attempted to refocus the topic from time to time but to no avail. SeachRE posts perverted information, lies, and perv invitations to thread members, which are occasionally in PMs but also on the public thread, and then posts attacks on anyone who responds or who posts innocently to other posters on the thread ... he seems to never tire of wallowing in such sick nonsense and seems to thrive on the negative feedback he recieves for it. Feel free to check it out for yourself. Jlallen, as you may know, is often subject to strong criticism for his stylistic presentations/retorts but there is absolutely no evidence supporting the slanderous allegations in that post. It is dishonorable for anyone to be reinforcing it, regardless of what may have happened in your personal involvement with Jlallen. In addition, I notice Jlallen is banned here so any such criticisms/commentary seems to me to be out of line at the least and further a violation of TOU. Best Regards, one_less