SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ddl who wrote (28424)11/25/1997 8:12:00 PM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.  Respond to of 35569
 
MXAM news looks good. This will only add credibility to our case. IPM has had their blunders I admit. The bottom line is this,We do have the metals and technology will win out. Im not happy the way the story has unfolded but I think better times are ahead. If those two twenty pound samples would have been in the "Sweet Spot " All this speculation would be behind us. Good job MXAM.

I posted this on the MXAM thread,

Richard, the numbers do look positve for MXAM, Kudos to Dale & Co. One thing
we can note is the lack of COC> I have no doubt that with COC the results would
have been the same. The areas that MXAM assayed by fire assay give the dirts
credibility. Now for the IPM spin on things. I think this is very good news, if IPM
would have come up with these numbers on COC we would have been thrilled. But
one important factor, IPM had only 2 twenty pound samples Fire Assayed, the results
were lower than expected but as Sam Shaw says "You must use Large Samples to get
accurate numbers" IPM used small samples and were at the low end of the scale
(although they did match Aurics numbers in relation to Sample Proximity) Lets see
what happens when Batemen evaluates the 2100 samples in the first Kilometer. IPM
and MXAM are in the same boat as far as I can tell. I like Runyons style though in PRs
Factual and to the Point without giving to much "Chicken to roost talk". This is a
feather in their cap. IPM aand MXAM have the goods. Good luck to all.
Your Friend,
Don Watson
|



To: ddl who wrote (28424)11/25/1997 9:39:00 PM
From: reg  Respond to of 35569
 
I read an article a while back about how VSE juniors loved to use
the British brokerage houses to promote their penny stocks to British
pension funds. A lot of pension money was lost in these paper tiger's.
Of course the principals did very well. My former broker used to
travel to London regularly to promote his penny stocks, not that it
really helped much.